On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 09:44:02PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have read quite some bug scripts today. I am kind of wondering (maybe
> > jsut
> > my imagination being limited) why you aren't just unconditionally including
> > those data instead of
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:19:25 +0100
Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 December 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > Well, for my own needs, emdebian-tools and apt-cross. Every bug report
> > against apt-cross would have benefited from getting answers to the
> > questions that are
On Tuesday 18 December 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
> Well, for my own needs, emdebian-tools and apt-cross. Every bug report
> against apt-cross would have benefited from getting answers to the
> questions that are now deployed in the bug script (that is why the
> questions are in the bug script). I
Bastian Venthur wrote:
> On 18.12.2007 03:47 schrieb David Nusinow:
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:47:39AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>>> Why was I opposed to implement this.
>>>
>>> 3. I'm definitely opposed to a feature which will pop up a *terminal*
>>> where a user has to do something before
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:06:21AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> >> 3. I'm definitely opposed to a feature which will pop up a *terminal*
> >> where a user has to do something before he can proceed reporting a bug.
> >> Sorry, but this won't happen in rng. I might consider such a thing if it
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> 1. I *personally* hated that some packages sent a *huge* amount of
> 2. I *personally* was very annoyed by packages with very long presubj
> 3. I'm definitely opposed to a feature which will pop up a *terminal*
> 4. I was *personally* very annoyed
On Tuesday 18 December 2007, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> > I haven't implemented presubj text in my patch, so this is a non-issue
> > for that specifically.
>
> Yes, but I've merged this bug with a similar one where the reporter
> wanted rng to support presubj.
And presubj is the most important thin
On 18.12.2007 03:47 schrieb David Nusinow:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:47:39AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> Why was I opposed to implement this.
>>
>> 2. I *personally* was very annoyed by packages with very long presubj
>> text, which I doubt anyone reads anyway. Since I don't want rng to be
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 02:47:14AM +, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:47:39AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> > Since I received a terrifying amount insults(!) via mail for not
> > implementing this feature request after my last blog entry, where I
> > asked for help developin
Hi Bastian,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:47:39AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> David Nusinow wrote:
> > Hi Bastian,
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 11:39:03PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> thanks for your effort and the patches. Personally, I don't like the
> >> idea of a
10 matches
Mail list logo
