On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 16:38 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
This is exactly the kind of problems the dependency based boot
sequencing is supposed to solve.
[...]
I have added:
Should-Start: slapd
to fix the problem that nslcd should be started after slapd.
However to solve the problem
[Arthur de Jong]
However to solve the problem that nslcd should be started before mail
servers I would like to add:
Provides: $named
at least exim and postfix have a Required-Start for this) but the
description on http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts suggests that
such a provides should
[Arthur de Jong]
So, what would the best solution for this problem?
- request slapd to be started at sequence 18 and start nslcd at
sequence 19 when this has changed (haven't extensively checked if that
would cause problems for slapd)
- add some magic to nslcd to do more retries during
3 matches
Mail list logo