Re: set unbound does not run default by /etc/default/unbound (Re: Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-11-15 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi all, On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:46:01 +0900 Hideki Yamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see no proper fix, except using an /etc/default file, which is ugly. Using /etc/default/unbound is reasonable, I think. Some of daemon packages (e.g. rsync) are not started by default because it is

set unbound does not run default by /etc/default/unbound (Re: Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-11-10 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:16:53 +0900 Hideki Yamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see no proper fix, except using an /etc/default file, which is ugly. Using /etc/default/unbound is reasonable, I think. Some of daemon packages (e.g. rsync) are not started by default because it is set in its

Re: Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-10-20 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hello Pierre, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe the problem here is somehow very generic, and that using a virtual package like proposed in the bug report (#500176) doesn't scale well. Especially for dns daemons. Packaging two of them myself (nsd3 that is an authoritative

Re: Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-10-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.10.08.1054 +0200]: FWIW I've upgraded a machine to replace pdnsd with unbound, it hit that bug of course. [...] I don't think this is too hard to ask from someone that is installing multiple DNS softwares on the same machine. A bit more user

Re: Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-10-09 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 09:07:00AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.10.08.1054 +0200]: FWIW I've upgraded a machine to replace pdnsd with unbound, it hit that bug of course. [...] I don't think this is too hard to ask from someone that is

Re: Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-10-09 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 09:07:00AM +0200, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: also sprach Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.10.08.1054 +0200]: FWIW I've upgraded a machine to replace pdnsd with unbound, it hit that bug of course. [...] I don't think this is too hard to ask from

Re: Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-10-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.10.09.1024 +0200]: Another problem that is looking for a solution is programs such as apache or dnsmasq which binaries may be used by other software (gnome-user-share, virt-manager...) but shouldn't be running daemons in this case. It is

Re: Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-10-08 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:46:11 +0200 Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Agreed, that would be nice. While this is something to consider for squeeze release goals, how do we solve the problem for lenny? I see no proper fix, except using an /etc/default file, which is ugly. Using

Re: Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-10-08 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 05:13:32PM +, Robert Edmonds wrote: On 2008-10-05, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW this problem is found in many other cases: see lighttpd with apache2 installed, or caudium or any other http daemon, and none of them has a bug about it, it's unfair

Re: Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-10-06 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.10.05.1117 +0200]: FWIW this problem is found in many other cases: see lighttpd with apache2 installed, or caudium or any other http daemon, and none of them has a bug about it, it's unfair to mark it as RC. Uh, don't you think that marking

Re: Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-10-06 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 07:48:18AM +, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.10.05.1117 +0200]: FWIW this problem is found in many other cases: see lighttpd with apache2 installed, or caudium or any other http daemon, and none of them has a bug about

Re: Bug#500176: This bug is still around and release-critical

2008-10-06 Thread Robert Edmonds
On 2008-10-05, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW this problem is found in many other cases: see lighttpd with apache2 installed, or caudium or any other http daemon, and none of them has a bug about it, it's unfair to mark it as RC. also note that this bug isn't symmetric with