Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-11-16 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
reassign 503096 emacs-goodies-el retitle 503096 emacs-goodies-el: please include alpaca.el thanks On November 3, 2008 at 1:08PM +0100, zack (at debian.org) wrote: On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 08:51:55PM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: I don't intend to push alpaca into the Emacs main tree. Please

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-11-04 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Hence the question goes as: considering that the next release of Debian is most likely going to be released with Emacs (= 23.1), which is integrated properly with EasyPG, do we need alpaca in Debian? I believe the answer is «no». I think that the alpaca package isn't meaningless even if

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-11-03 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 08:51:55PM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: I don't intend to push alpaca into the Emacs main tree. Please allow making just an optional Debian package. Does anyone still strongly have objection to this ITP? If so, please tell me against the above comments. Yes, I

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-11-03 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
On October 26, 2008 at 9:12PM +0900, tats (at debian.org) wrote: On October 26, 2008 at 11:11AM +0100, zack (at debian.org) wrote: Indeed, the fact that EasyPG is now integrated in development version of Emacs is my main reason for objecting this ITP. [...] Hence the question goes as:

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-27 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
On October 26, 2008 at 3:34PM +, rswarbrick (at googlemail.com) wrote: `alpaca' uses symmetric encryption with --cipher-algo AES for a new *.gpg file by default, while I haven't found an easy way to customizet EasyPG. Anyway, the point of this post: gpg's default symmetric

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-26 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:14:53PM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: I think that a package for one single file is too much. I agree with Luca here. FWIW I also formally object to this ITP. Even so, the Debian package is helpful for users to install, upgrade and use it. This is not an

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-26 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
On October 26, 2008 at 11:11AM +0100, zack (at debian.org) wrote: Indeed, the fact that EasyPG is now integrated in development version of Emacs is my main reason for objecting this ITP. [...] Hence the question goes as: considering that the next release of Debian is most likely going to be

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-26 Thread Rupert Swarbrick
Tatsuya Kinoshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think that the alpaca package isn't meaningless even if less people use alpaca than EasyPG. Grr. It's FEWER! `alpaca' uses symmetric encryption with --cipher-algo AES for a new *.gpg file by default, while I haven't found an easy way to

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-25 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
On October 25, 2008 at 12:34AM +0200, joerg (at debian.org) wrote: On 11548 March 1977, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: How about integrating/merging alpaca into EasyPG? Anyway, alpaca is a different implementation and well maintained by the other developer. I think that the alpaca package

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-24 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Tatsuya Kinoshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Anyway, I'll add more information to the package description and README.Debian. Also, I'll consider the conflict of EasyPG. The alpaca feature should not be enabled when EasyPG's epa-file feature is enabled. How about integrating/merging alpaca

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-24 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
On October 24, 2008 at 9:18AM +0200, siretart (at debian.org) wrote: How about integrating/merging alpaca into EasyPG? I'll request the always-use-symmetric option to the EasyPG developer, which is a major blocker of migrating from alpaca to EasyPG, I think. Anyway, alpaca is a different

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-24 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 11548 March 1977, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: How about integrating/merging alpaca into EasyPG? Anyway, alpaca is a different implementation and well maintained by the other developer. I think that the alpaca package isn't meaningless even if less people use alpaca than EasyPG. There is the

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-23 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
Hi Luca, thanks for the comment. On October 22, 2008 at 7:18PM +0200, luca (at pca.it) wrote: * Package name: alpaca [...] * URL : http://www.mew.org/~kazu/proj/cipher/ I think that a package for one single file is too much. Even so, the Debian package is helpful for

Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-22 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tatsuya Kinoshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: alpaca Version : 0.13 Upstream Author : Kazu Yamamoto * URL : http://www.mew.org/~kazu/proj/cipher/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: Emacs Lisp Description :

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-22 Thread Luca Capello
Hi Tatsuya! On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:58:11 +0200, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: * Package name: alpaca [...] * URL : http://www.mew.org/~kazu/proj/cipher/ I think that a package for one single file is too much. Description : GnuPG file handling for Emacs `alpaca' is an Emacs