On Sat, 06 Mar 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
/dev/something just feels so wrong. /dev contains block and character
devices, and almost nothing else (except some udev and initramfs files)
Not really. There's the whole /dev/shm crap (which one is not supposed to
access directly anyway).
Why should
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 02:51:11AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
/dev/something just feels so wrong. /dev contains block and character
devices, and almost nothing else (except some udev and initramfs files)
Why should cgroups control files, which are hardly device files, be
found under /dev ?
On Mar 07, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
Why not? /dev/pts/ is a kernel filesystem mounted below /dev, and /dev
itself is a kernel filesystem (tmpfs or devtmpfs).
And both only contain character or block devices (or occasional
directories). Nothing else.
I meant /dev/shm.
--
ciao,
On Mar 06, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote:
- cgroups (needed for accounting and management of system resources)
I thought the libcgroup package handled this one, but might be wrong.
I understand that the cgconfig program from cgroup-bin does mount it
(in /mnt/cgroups/cpu, which I
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.87dsf-8.1
Severity: normal
I am tentatively opening this bug on initscripts to start a discussion,
but I am unsure about the best way to solve the problem.
Still, I believe it is important to solve it in time for the next
release because it is a prerequisite of
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 05:03:05AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Do we agree to mount these filesystems on /dev/ subdirectories?
Fedora[1] uses /dev/hugepages/ for hugetlbfs, and while we had a
discussion on debian-devel@ about where cgroups should be mounted there
was no clear winner.
The
6 matches
Mail list logo
