Re: Bug#597571: nodejs: non common executable name (exclusive alternatives ?)

2010-09-23 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 01:32:21 +0200 Jérémy Lal je...@edagames.com wrote: On 23/09/2010 01:24, Ian Jackson wrote: Jérémy Lal writes (Re: Bug#597571: nodejs: non common executable name (exclusive alternatives ?)): On might object node would have a different meaning, depending

Re: Bug#597571: nodejs: non common executable name (exclusive alternatives ?)

2010-09-22 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 21/09/2010 18:01, Patrick Ouellette wrote: On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 05:26:30PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: Did you say that before? I don't think so. Personally, I care about the Debian package only because the original bugreport (from where this discussion started) was against the Debian

Re: Bug#597571: nodejs: non common executable name (exclusive alternatives ?)

2010-09-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Jérémy Lal writes (Re: Bug#597571: nodejs: non common executable name (exclusive alternatives ?)): On might object node would have a different meaning, depending on the packages installed ; still, nodejs or x25node (if its maintainer cares to follow) would be there, and unambiguous. I think

Re: Bug#597571: nodejs: non common executable name (exclusive alternatives ?)

2010-09-22 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 23/09/2010 01:24, Ian Jackson wrote: Jérémy Lal writes (Re: Bug#597571: nodejs: non common executable name (exclusive alternatives ?)): On might object node would have a different meaning, depending on the packages installed ; still, nodejs or x25node (if its maintainer cares to follow