Bug#620993: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#620993: general: Lenny 2.6.26-2 has noticably increased swap usage, tho not swap thrashing)

2011-04-05 Thread Daniel Gary
I have, but fixing monitoring to suit edge cases created from a recent upgrade doesn't make the edge cases non-issues. This is still an issue whether you want to hide it under nagios or not, so I'd appreciate a little more assistance in finding the problem beyond fixing nagios. If you go the

Bug#620993: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#620993: general: Lenny 2.6.26-2 has noticably increased swap usage, tho not swap thrashing)

2011-04-05 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 05/04/2011 21:15, Daniel Gary wrote: I have, but fixing monitoring to suit edge cases created from a recent upgrade doesn't make the edge cases non-issues. This is still an issue whether you want to hide it under nagios or not, I do not understand the issue. You have some swap and you

Bug#620993: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#620993: general: Lenny 2.6.26-2 has noticably increased swap usage, tho not swap thrashing)

2011-04-05 Thread Daniel Gary
I'm not arguing that, I fully expect the kernel to use it to swap *if needed*. And if this was 20MB of swap, or maybe 100MB, ok, sure, the kernel might be swapping old pages out, but 300MB+ swapping out in 2.6.26-2 where 0MB swapped out in 2.6.26-1, and I can't find anything in the kernel.org

Re: Bug#620993: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#620993: general: Lenny 2.6.26-2 has noticably increased swap usage, tho not swap thrashing)

2011-04-05 Thread Russell Coker
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Daniel Gary dgary1...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not arguing that, I fully expect the kernel to use it to swap *if needed*. And if this was 20MB of swap, or maybe 100MB, ok, sure, the kernel might be swapping old pages out, but 300MB+ swapping out in 2.6.26-2 where 0MB Using

Bug#620993: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#620993: general: Lenny 2.6.26-2 has noticably increased swap usage, tho not swap thrashing)

2011-04-05 Thread Daniel Gary
On 4/5/2011 2:47 PM, Russell Coker wrote: On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Daniel Garydgary1...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not arguing that, I fully expect the kernel to use it to swap *if needed*. And if this was 20MB of swap, or maybe 100MB, ok, sure, the kernel might be swapping old pages out, but 300MB+