On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 03:19:29PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 04:35:35PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > > Note that a prerequisite for such debian/changelog parsing would be
> > > > that policy sets strict syntax and semantics requirements.
> > >
> > > No, we do not
Hello,
[removing bug against -policy from CC]
On Sat, Aug 05 2017, Bill Allombert wrote:
> How do you get that it would work 90% of package ? Using [] for
> non-team members is very common.
My intent was to discover who is working on a package. It would be okay
for non-team members to be
On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 04:35:35PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > Note that a prerequisite for such debian/changelog parsing would be
> > > that policy sets strict syntax and semantics requirements.
> >
> > No, we do not need to block such a feature that would work for 90% of
> > packages
On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 07:00:16AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Aug 05 2017, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > I assume you are thinking of parsing the [ name ] syntax used by many
> > teams.
>
> Yes.
>
> > Note that a prerequisite for such debian/changelog parsing would be
> > that
Hello,
On Sat, Aug 05 2017, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I assume you are thinking of parsing the [ name ] syntax used by many
> teams.
Yes.
> Note that a prerequisite for such debian/changelog parsing would be
> that policy sets strict syntax and semantics requirements.
No, we do not need to block
5 matches
Mail list logo
