Re: Bug tracking system and testing distribution Re: Potato now stable

2000-08-21 Thread Christoph Martin
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Christoph Martin wrote: So, what is the policy to do with a package for the testing distribution, if there is an important bug? Do you remove the package unconditionaly or do you try investigate (like in the rc buglist) if the bug really applies?

Re: Bug tracking system and testing distribution Re: Potato now stable

2000-08-17 Thread Christoph Martin
Joey Hess writes: Christoph Martin wrote: We have a problem with the bug tracking system as long as we can't really find out to which versions of a package a bug really applies. We only mosttimes have the version of the packages where a problem showed up. But we don't know if the bug

Re: Bug tracking system and testing distribution Re: Potato now stable

2000-08-17 Thread Joey Hess
Christoph Martin wrote: So, what is the policy to do with a package for the testing distribution, if there is an important bug? Do you remove the package unconditionaly or do you try investigate (like in the rc buglist) if the bug really applies? Well if I were AJ I would just mechanically

Re: Bug tracking system and testing distribution Re: Potato now stable

2000-08-16 Thread Joey Hess
Christoph Martin wrote: We have a problem with the bug tracking system as long as we can't really find out to which versions of a package a bug really applies. We only mosttimes have the version of the packages where a problem showed up. But we don't know if the bug was introduced with this

Bug tracking system and testing distribution Re: Potato now stable

2000-08-15 Thread Christoph Martin
Anthony Towns writes: * Working out which bugs are really release-critical and fixing their severity so we know where we're at is overly time consuming. We have a problem with the bug tracking system as long as we can't really find out to which versions of a package a