Re: Build-indep as a way to not build doc. (was: Re: Proposed release goal: fix debian/rules build-arch)

2009-02-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 02:39:59PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > If we can ever settle on a suitable implementation, I would expect the > > savings of both human and CPU cycles to be sizeable, and worth the effort. > If the problem is limited to local building of packages without their > docum

Build-indep as a way to not build doc. (was: Re: Proposed release goal: fix debian/rules build-arch)

2009-02-16 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 03:34:41PM -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit : > In some cases, building the arch-indep documentation takes longer, and > requires downloading/installing more build dependencies, than building the > arch-dep binaries. I've found this to be a waste of human cycles before > when