I noticed while verifying that the buildds weren't still using the buggy
g++ 3.3.2-0pre4 that some are using 3.3.2-0pre1 which is 6 weeks old. Is
there a particular reason some of the buildds are so out of date?
Chris
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:25:50PM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
I noticed while verifying that the buildds weren't still using the buggy
g++ 3.3.2-0pre4 that some are using 3.3.2-0pre1 which is 6 weeks old. Is
there a particular reason some of the buildds are so out of date?
They must be
2 matches
Mail list logo