I have just activated 77 removal hints - attached is a dd-list of the
packages with a removal hint now. The list was filtered by rechecking
the severity and whether the bug still affected sid by using UDD (with a
hanful of them was manually checked as well).
Should your package still be listed
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 01:10:51AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
camitk (U)
A fixed version is since two days in
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
Thanks for your QA effort
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 2013-07-08 01:34, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 01:10:51AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
camitk (U)
A fixed version is since two days in
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
Thanks for your QA effort
Andreas.
Humble suggestion:
Sort the bug list (sort -k2 would be great) to make it easier to read
through the list and to find packages which might interest one.
It is a very useful report; a sort by package name would make it better.
-JimC
--
James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com OpenPGP:
Hi,
Thanks a lot for this work.
On 30/06/13 at 23:32 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
found in the attached dd-list.
The packages have been selected based on the
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
#678383 [pixelmed]: pixelmed: FTBFS with Java7 (uses internal Java API)
Would it be possible to filter out (in the future?) any bugs that are
marked as pending ? I have no control on this process.
Thanks,
--
To
On 2013-07-01 09:05, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
#678383 [pixelmed]: pixelmed: FTBFS with Java7 (uses internal Java API)
Would it be possible to filter out (in the future?) any bugs that are
marked as pending ? I have no
On 2013-07-01 08:21, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
Thanks a lot for this work.
On 30/06/13 at 23:32 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
found in the attached dd-list.
There is a fix for rrep but it is waiting for sponsorship (#702588).
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
Quoting Lucas Nussbaum (2013-07-01 08:21:30)
Currently, the following criterias are used:
| Key packages are:
| - packages whose popcon is higher than 5% of the max popcon (that's
| 7570 insts currently)
| OR
| - packages of priority = standard
| OR
| - packages of section
On 01/07/13 at 15:00 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
Hi,
Quoting Lucas Nussbaum (2013-07-01 08:21:30)
Currently, the following criterias are used:
| Key packages are:
| - packages whose popcon is higher than 5% of the max popcon (that's
| 7570 insts currently)
| OR
| - packages of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
found in the attached dd-list.
The packages have been selected based on the following criteria:
- The package
12 matches
Mail list logo
