On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 05:36:07PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Darcs has a nice way of pushing patches via e-mail, with GPG signatures
even. These can be processed in an automated way on the server,
verified against, for instance, the Debian keyring, and then applied to
the repository.
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 08:31:37PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Right, bzr is great when you have a designed person to integrate
contributor's changes after review.
But if you have a set of equal developers, bzr can be also used in a
very similar way
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 05:36:07PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Darcs has a nice way of pushing patches via e-mail, with GPG signatures
even. These can be processed in an automated way on the server,
verified against, for instance, the Debian
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 06:12:34PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
diff also doesn't preserve permissions, so some are using debian/rules
anyway.
Indeed but that can make thing broke due the wrong permission of
upstream files, iff you use darcs to maintain those fixes mixed with
changes for
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 06:12:34PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
diff also doesn't preserve permissions, so some are using debian/rules
anyway.
Indeed but that can make thing broke due the wrong permission of
upstream files, iff you use darcs to
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 14:55 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 08:31:37PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Right, bzr is great when you have a designed person to integrate
contributor's changes after review.
But if you have a set of equal developers, bzr can be also used in a
also sprach John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.2247 +0100]:
I do use darcs to track patches against upstream. I really don't
understand the whole cdbs/dpatch/whatever thing -- why use a hack to
manage your patches when you could use a real VC tool that does it
better?
I agree, dpatch
* John Goerzen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 06:12:34PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
diff also doesn't preserve permissions, so some are using debian/rules
anyway.
Indeed but that can make thing broke due the wrong permission of
upstream files, iff you use darcs
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
