On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:49:22 -0500
Jamin W. Collins jcoll...@asgardsrealm.net wrote:
Marvin Renich wrote:
* Harald Braumann ha...@unheit.net [090113 05:47]:
AFAIK, there's no way for multiple independent packages for using
the same user. So jabber-muc needs to create its own user. On
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Harald Braumann ha...@unheit.net wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:49:22 -0500
Jamin W. Collins jcoll...@asgardsrealm.net wrote:
Marvin Renich wrote:
* Harald Braumann ha...@unheit.net [090113 05:47]:
AFAIK, there's no way for multiple independent
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:20 PM, revuedelibre . revuedeli...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Harald Braumann ha...@unheit.netwrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:49:22 -0500
Jamin W. Collins jcoll...@asgardsrealm.net wrote:
Marvin Renich wrote:
* Harald Braumann
* Harald Braumann ha...@unheit.net [090113 16:49]:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:57:11 -0800 Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
If they remove the user on purge, that should be changed anyway.
Well, jabber-common does remove the user jabber on purge, jabberd2,
though, doesn't. And it seems
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:25:53 -0500
Marvin Renich m...@renich.org wrote:
* Harald Braumann ha...@unheit.net [090113 16:49]:
Well, jabber-common does remove the user jabber on purge, jabberd2,
though, doesn't. And it seems that opinions diverge on this matter.
See e.g.
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Harald Braumann wrote:
Why do you need to conflict with jabber-common?
jabber-muc needs to conflict with jabber-common, until there is a
version that does not remove the user on purge. Otherwise, when
both are installed and jabber-common is purged, jabber-muc stops
* Harald Braumann ha...@unheit.net [090113 05:47]:
Hi,
I'd like to package mu-conference 0.7 (multi-user chat component for
jabber). The version currently in Debian (jabber-muc 0.6.0) uses the
user ``jabber'', which is created by jabber-common, on which
jabber-muc depends.
The new
Marvin Renich wrote:
* Harald Braumann ha...@unheit.net [090113 05:47]:
AFAIK, there's no way for multiple independent packages for using the
same user. So jabber-muc needs to create its own user. On update,
that's no problem. The post-install script can chown the
package's directories for
(I'm subscribed, no need to CC me.)
* Jamin W. Collins jcoll...@asgardsrealm.net [090114 14:09]:
I'm not subscribed, haven't been following the lists for a while. The
old package should probably be removed completely in favor of the new.
That's fine. I didn't know the state of jabber-muc,
Hi,
I'd like to package mu-conference 0.7 (multi-user chat component for
jabber). The version currently in Debian (jabber-muc 0.6.0) uses the
user ``jabber'', which is created by jabber-common, on which
jabber-muc depends.
The new version can be installed stand-alone, and thus there won't be
any
Hi,
Harald Braumann wrote:
package's directories for the new user. But a downgrade would then not
be possible. The old version couldn't access the directories.
Is there precedence for such a situation? How can it be resolved?
Downgrades are not supported.
(which doesn't mean they should if
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:35:49AM +0100, Harald Braumann wrote:
AFAIK, there's no way for multiple independent packages for using the
same user.
Why not? There are already multiple packages that use the same user, e.g.
www-data.
You should only create it and never remove to avoid
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:55:31 +0100
Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Harald Braumann wrote:
package's directories for the new user. But a downgrade would then
not be possible. The old version couldn't access the directories.
Is there precedence for such a situation? How can
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:51:29 +0100
Francesco P. Lovergine fran...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:35:49AM +0100, Harald Braumann wrote:
AFAIK, there's no way for multiple independent packages for using
the same user.
Why not? There are already multiple packages that
Harald Braumann ha...@unheit.net writes:
Francesco P. Lovergine fran...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:35:49AM +0100, Harald Braumann wrote:
AFAIK, there's no way for multiple independent packages for using
the same user.
Why not? There are already multiple packages that use
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:15:47 -0800
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Harald Braumann ha...@unheit.net writes:
Francesco P. Lovergine fran...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:35:49AM +0100, Harald Braumann wrote:
AFAIK, there's no way for multiple independent packages for
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:49:17PM +0100, Harald Braumann wrote:
Well, yes, but I don't see why you'd need a globally allocated user.
Why don't you just use the same username as the other package? I
don't see why that wouldn't work, and I don't see anything in Policy
9.2 that says you
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:57:11 -0800
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:49:17PM +0100, Harald Braumann wrote:
Well, yes, but I don't see why you'd need a globally allocated
user. Why don't you just use the same username as the other
package? I don't see
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:57:11 -0800
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:49:17PM +0100, Harald Braumann wrote:
Well, yes, but I don't see why you'd need a globally allocated
user. Why don't you just use the same username as the other
package? I don't see
19 matches
Mail list logo
