On 18/01/2012 10:09, Peter Miller wrote:
Are there any plans to write a tool to scan a project tree and generate
the DEP-5 debian/copyright file?
I personally use:
$ licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5
debian/copyright
And then manually modify debian/copyright to
Le Wednesday 18 January 2012 09:03:14, Chow Loong Jin a écrit :
I personally use:
$ licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5
debian/copyright
And then manually modify debian/copyright to compress entries to
satisfaction.
Oooh, that's a good one. I'll probably reuse
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 16:03 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
$ licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5
debian/copyright
That is just what I was looking for, although I doubt I'll be editing
the output, just adding it to my build system, next to where I build the
Debian
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 20:01 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Peter Miller pmil...@opensource.org.au writes:
My understanding is that all project files are covered, although
wildcards are permitted.
Each different copyright x license combination needs its own separate
entry.
I don't think
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Note that Copyright (C) 2008 Peter Miller is different than Copyright
(C) 2011 Peter Miller is different than Copyright (C) 1991, 2012 Peter
Miller, so the cross product is going to be substantial for long lived
projects, even when the number of
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:36:07PM +1100, Peter Miller wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 20:01 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Peter Miller pmil...@opensource.org.au writes:
...
While I'm banging on about semantics, when you are looking up a file by
name, is it the first file name pattern match that
Le Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 04:03:14PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin a écrit :
On 18/01/2012 10:09, Peter Miller wrote:
Are there any plans to write a tool to scan a project tree and generate
the DEP-5 debian/copyright file?
I personally use:
$ licensecheck --copyright -r . |
On 12-01-18 at 08:31pm, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 04:03:14PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin a écrit :
On 18/01/2012 10:09, Peter Miller wrote:
Are there any plans to write a tool to scan a project tree and generate
the DEP-5 debian/copyright file?
I personally use:
$
Pushing this towards debian-project, which is where the DEP-5 discussion
is supposed to happen.
Peter Miller pmil...@opensource.org.au writes:
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
Files paragraph (Repeatable)
The declaration of copyright and license for files is done in
Dear FTP Masters,
in http://bugs.debian.org/462996, me and others have expressed
interest to have a written document that describes precisely
what the Debian copyright file must contain. Do you think it
is realisable, and if yes, how could we help you ? Would you
like to be submitted a draft ?
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 09:49 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
interest to have a written document that describes precisely
what the Debian copyright file must contain.
Are there any plans to write a tool to scan a project tree and generate
the DEP-5 debian/copyright file?
I am my own upstream for
Peter Miller peter.miller@gmail.com writes:
Are there any plans to write a tool to scan a project tree and generate
the DEP-5 debian/copyright file?
I am my own upstream for many projects, and some of them have thousands
of source files. There is no way I am going to write and maintain
Peter Miller wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 09:49 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
interest to have a written document that describes precisely
what the Debian copyright file must contain.
Are there any plans to write a tool to scan a project tree and generate
the DEP-5 debian/copyright file?
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 18:20 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Peter Miller peter.miller@gmail.com writes:
This objection makes me think that you believe that more information is
required by the DEP-5 format than is in your existing debian/copyright
files.
My understanding is that all project
Peter Miller pmil...@opensource.org.au writes:
My understanding is that all project files are covered, although
wildcards are permitted.
Each different copyright x license combination needs its own separate
entry.
I don't think this is the case. I see no reason why you couldn't just
have a
15 matches
Mail list logo
