On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 03:23:08PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Yup, but to note: Consensus-driven arguments can only go so far and scale
> poorly with more people. Ultimately contentious issues need to be voted on,
> otherwise you can be held hostage by a single person or small vocal group.
On 2018-07-27 10:46, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 15111 March 1977, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
Loomio [1] is a powerful tool to organize decision making. We have a
long
standing RFP [2] for Loomio and I hope that with help of Ruby team it
can be
packaged without too much effort.
It is not the tool
On 15111 March 1977, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>> You can't solve a social problem using technical means.
> I do not share your skepticism. We can benefit from imposing some structure
> and there is nothing wrong about exploring options to _improve_ the process
> while not necessarily aiming at
On Friday, 27 July 2018 6:46:33 PM AEST Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> You can't solve a social problem using technical means.
I do not share your skepticism. We can benefit from imposing some structure
and there is nothing wrong about exploring options to _improve_ the process
while not necessarily
On 15111 March 1977, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Loomio [1] is a powerful tool to organize decision making. We have a long
> standing RFP [2] for Loomio and I hope that with help of Ruby team it can be
> packaged without too much effort.
It is not the tool here that is the problem. It is the
Here in Debian we often need to coordinate decision making between multiple
people. Mail list is not a proper instrument to facilitate that task as it is
difficult to find out where things stand and who is winning the argument.
Loomio [1] is a powerful tool to organize decision making. We have
6 matches
Mail list logo
