On Aug 12, Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > multi-gnome-terminal
> Already obsolete, IIRC ?
I wish, since it is a buggy POS which does not even support UTF-8 and
has been abandoned long ago by the upstream maintainers.
But it's the only terminal which I am really comfortable using sin
Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> On 8/14/07, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:57:51 +0200
>> "Carl Fürstenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I knew that my list was incomplete, so if you want to regenerate the
>>> page, use following perl script:
>>>
>>> #!/usr/bin/p
On 8/14/07, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:57:51 +0200
> "Carl Fürstenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I knew that my list was incomplete, so if you want to regenerate the
> > page, use following perl script:
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/perl
> >
> > use strict;
> > u
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:57:51 +0200
"Carl Fürstenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I knew that my list was incomplete, so if you want to regenerate the
> page, use following perl script:
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl
>
> use strict;
> use warnings;
> use Parse::DebControl;
Carl - that module is in CPAN
On 8/12/07, Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/12/07, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:45:42 + (UTC)
> > William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Neil Williams debian.org> writes:
> > >
> > > > If those figures are correct, it look
On 8/12/07, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:45:42 + (UTC)
> William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Neil Williams debian.org> writes:
> >
> > > If those figures are correct, it looks like GTK1 will be with us for
> > > quite some time yet.
> >
> > Don
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wmbubble
437425
> wmcliphist
437433
> wmclockmon
437442
> wmfishtime
437429
> wmmaiload
437444
> wmressel
437430
> wmusic
Remote control dockapp for XMMS, will go away with XMMS. I've removed
it from the wiki too.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - D
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:45:42 + (UTC)
William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neil Williams debian.org> writes:
>
> > If those figures are correct, it looks like GTK1 will be with us for
> > quite some time yet.
>
> Don't give up hope quite yet.
To save repeating the list in email:
htt
On 2007-08-12, William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> karamba
>
> This is a Qt app, and it has been mostly replaced with SuperKaramba AFAIK.
And is only using gtk1/xmms to communicate with xmms. It builds nicely
without also. (Of course, you then miss the xmms functionality, but ...)
/Sune
Neil Williams debian.org> writes:
> If those figures are correct, it looks like GTK1 will be with us for
> quite some time yet.
Don't give up hope quite yet.
>
> After a little more trimming of libraries, packages that are just
> dependencies of other packages in the list, I get 192 unorphaned
Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JB> And there are still some useful applications in the list...
>
> Probably some workflow for phasing them out might help.
It's possible for some of these applications, but not for all. The
best approach is probably to port them over to GTK2, but I s
Twas brillig at 15:07:29 12.08.2007 UTC+02 when Julien BLACHE did gyre and
gimble:
>> Contrary to my own preconceptions, I'd say that the idea of removing Gtk1 is
>> dead-in-the-water. :-(
JB> And there are still some useful applications in the list...
Probably some workflow for phasing th
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 274 are neither gtk libraries nor related to xmms.
>
> 231 of those are not orphaned.
That's a lot of packages.
> After a little more trimming of libraries, packages that are just
> dependencies of other packages in the list, I get 192 unorphaned
> pack
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 11:52:45 +0100
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just because I had nothing to do, I generated a list on the wiki on
> > all packages that depends on gtk+ 1.2; see:
> > http://wiki.debian.org/GTK+_1%2e2_leftovers
OK, a few stats from that page (which I've updated to
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 11:52:45AM +0100, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> With apache1 being removed, isn't it the right time to remove gtk1
> (and glib1.2) as well?
It's also time to remove libxml1.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 03:47:46 +0200
"Carl Fürstenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/12/07, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Le samedi 11 août 2007 à 06:57 +0200, David Lopez Zajara (Er_Maqui)
> > a écrit :
> > > You are saying to the mantainers who if they doesnt work
> > > on a
16 matches
Mail list logo
