Luca Capello wrote:
Since I want to support smooth upgrades, I need to do the following:
Package: hunchentoot
Version: 2.0
Provides: cl-hunchentoot [1]
Replace: cl-hunchentoot (<< 2.0)
Conflicts: cl-hunchentoot (<< 2.0)
Package: cl-hunchentoot
Depends: hunchentoot
I was under
On Friday 13 June 2008 18:22, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Luca Capello ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > As explained at [1], I'm in the process of renaming the binary package
> > cl-hunchentoot to hunchentoot to more closely follow upstream. Since
> > cl-hunchentoot is not in Etch, if I'm not wron
Quoting Luca Capello ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi there!
>
> As explained at [1], I'm in the process of renaming the binary package
> cl-hunchentoot to hunchentoot to more closely follow upstream. Since
> cl-hunchentoot is not in Etch, if I'm not wrong the new transitional
> package can be dropped a
Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: hunchentoot
> Version: 2.0
> Provides: cl-hunchentoot [1]
> Replace: cl-hunchentoot (<< 2.0)
> Conflicts: cl-hunchentoot (<< 2.0)
>
> Package: cl-hunchentoot
> Depends: hunchentoot
>
> Am I correct?
I believe so, modulo one typo (R
Hi there!
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:24:47 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>> in the binary section of hunchentoot, I think you have to add
>>>
>>> Replaces: cl-hunchentoot
>>> Conflicts: cl-hunchentoot
>>
>> If you
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
>>> I'll proceed in the following way for debian/control: rename
>>> cl-hunchentoot to hunchentoot and then create the transitional binary
>>> package cl-hunchentoot which depends on hunchentoot.
>>>
>>> Is this O
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Sandro Tosi wrote:
I'll proceed in the following way for debian/control: rename
cl-hunchentoot to hunchentoot and then create the transitional binary
package cl-hunchentoot which depends on hunchentoot.
Is this OK? Do I need something else?
in the binary section of hunch
Ciao Luca,
> I'll proceed in the following way for debian/control: rename
> cl-hunchentoot to hunchentoot and then create the transitional binary
> package cl-hunchentoot which depends on hunchentoot.
>
> Is this OK? Do I need something else?
in the binary section of hunchentoot, I think you hav
Hi there!
As explained at [1], I'm in the process of renaming the binary package
cl-hunchentoot to hunchentoot to more closely follow upstream. Since
cl-hunchentoot is not in Etch, if I'm not wrong the new transitional
package can be dropped as soon as Lenny is released.
I'll proceed in the foll
9 matches
Mail list logo
