Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-27 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Le 25/12/2016 à 21:09, Vincent Bernat a écrit : > ❦ 25 décembre 2016 19:17 +0100, Stéphane Blondon > : > >> So, the final compiled file can be a mix of several languages but the >> languages are separated in the sources. >> >> Sometimes yaml is transformed into HTML too; I saw that on the ser

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-26 Thread Russell Stuart
On Sun, 2016-12-25 at 19:17 +0100, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > Perhaps I missed something, so I'm curious to learn more about it (a > link or some keywords can be a good start). The buzz work mix is: - vue-loader - webpack - webpack plugin for .vue files (mix of HTML, CSS/sass/stylus, and JS). and

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-25 Thread Jérémy Lal
2016-12-25 19:17 GMT+01:00 Stéphane Blondon : > Le 24/12/2016 à 00:51, Russell Stuart a écrit : >> [0] I was proudly shown some production "web code" yesterday. Cutting >> edge stuff, apparently. A single file contained HTML, css, and JS. >> [...] >> >> But how could a linter process

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-25 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 25 décembre 2016 19:17 +0100, Stéphane Blondon  : > So, the final compiled file can be a mix of several languages but the > languages are separated in the sources. > > Sometimes yaml is transformed into HTML too; I saw that on the server side. > > Perhaps I missed something, so I'm curious to l

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-25 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Le 24/12/2016 à 00:51, Russell Stuart a écrit : > [0] I was proudly shown some production "web code" yesterday. Cutting > edge stuff, apparently. A single file contained HTML, css, and JS. > [...] > > But how could a linter process that, I asked - it was some unholy > mess of 3(?

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-23 Thread Russell Stuart
On Fri, 2016-12-23 at 21:36 +, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > This list is about development of Debian. > > Not about how to raise money to ease developing Debian. The first condition is fulfilled - the email is about getting development done within Debian. In fact given ITP's I've seen floating

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-23 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Excerpts from Pirate Praveen's message of December 23, 2016 6:26 pm: On വെള്ളി 23 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 09:52 വൈകു, Joerg Jaspert wrote: For any problem, yes. For fundraising, no. So only problem, no solution? This list is about development of Debian. Not about how to raise money to ease developing

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 23 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 09:52 വൈകു, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > For any problem, yes. For fundraising, no. So only problem, no solution? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-23 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 14530 March 1977, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> While its good (for someone) that this work is done, and hooray if it >> can be sponsored by crowdfunding, I dont think that this list is the >> proper place for it. > 2. I think -devel is right place for discussing a problem that goes > beyond a singl

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 23 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 01:38 വൈകു, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > While its good (for someone) that this work is done, and hooray if it > can be sponsored by crowdfunding, I dont think that this list is the > proper place for it. > I thought this is the right place because, 1. It affects many packag

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-23 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 14529 March 1977, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> We are onto our second round of crowd funding >> https://www.generosity.com/community-fundraising/debian-browserify-2 > gulp is now accepted in main. If we get more support for the campaign, > we hope to continue packaging more nodejs build tools (next

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-22 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ബുധന്‍ 23 നവംബര്‍ 2016 10:12 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: > We are onto our second round of crowd funding > https://www.generosity.com/community-fundraising/debian-browserify-2 gulp is now accepted in main. If we get more support for the campaign, we hope to continue packaging more nodejs build

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thursday 13 October 2016 12:13 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote: > I suppose you have considered using browserify-lite when possible ? > It is actually quite rare (and usually a bad sign of quality, imo) to > see modules > that do require the full-fledge browserify. I did use browserify-lite for fuzzaldrin

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-24 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 24/11/16 09:31, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Thursday 24 November 2016 01:31 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> If you can expand the scope of your crowdfunding effort to cover >> those libraries needed for homer-ui, then I'm happy to promote >> the crowdfunding in the HOMER and free RTC communities. >

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thursday 24 November 2016 01:31 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > If you can expand the scope of your crowdfunding effort to cover those > libraries needed for homer-ui, then I'm happy to promote the > crowdfunding in the HOMER and free RTC communities. Can you ask the upstream to create a list of dep

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-24 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 24/11/16 06:26, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Thursday 24 November 2016 01:25 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> Would you be interested in helping package JS dependencies for >> homer-ui[1] in Debian? > > Right now, my plates are full. I will have a look once I complete > gulp and webpack. > >> We a

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thursday 24 November 2016 01:25 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Would you be interested in helping package JS dependencies for > homer-ui[1] in Debian? Right now, my plates are full. I will have a look once I complete gulp and webpack. > We already have a homer-api package[2] but it is most useful

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-23 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 23/11/16 17:42, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Friday 11 November 2016 05:04 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> We have already completed 19 days of work (120 new packages and >> 8 updates). We raised only half the target and completed close to >> the same amount of work. > > We are onto our second rou

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Friday 11 November 2016 05:04 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > We have already completed 19 days of work (120 new packages and 8 > updates). We raised only half the target and completed close to the same > amount of work. We are onto our second round of crowd funding https://www.generosity.com/commu

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tuesday 01 November 2016 02:01 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > We shifted out focus to grunt from browserify realizing grunt is needed > by more packages. Final update before the fund raising closes in about 20 hours https://poddery.com/posts/2734574 Summary: all new dependencies are completed (4

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-01 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2016, നവംബർ 2 2:22:00 AM IST, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >Did you means that you plan a rebuild of package with grunt when grunt >is released ? At the minimum the packages I care about and currently in contrib or should be in contrib. libjs-handlebars, libjs-fuzzaldrin-plus, jquery modules f

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-11-01 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Wednesday 12 October 2016 11:09 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi, > > We have been discussing browserified javascript situation in debian for > sometime. We decided to spent one full month on packaging browserify if > we can raise enough money via crowd funding. See > http://igg.me/at/debian-brow

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-10-12 Thread Jérémy Lal
2016-10-12 19:39 GMT+02:00 Pirate Praveen : > Hi, > > We have been discussing browserified javascript situation in debian for > sometime. We decided to spent one full month on packaging browserify if > we can raise enough money via crowd funding. See > http://igg.me/at/debian-browserify for more d

Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-10-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
Hi, We have been discussing browserified javascript situation in debian for sometime. We decided to spent one full month on packaging browserify if we can raise enough money via crowd funding. See http://igg.me/at/debian-browserify for more details. Hoping to have a good solution to this problem,