-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anthony DeRobertis on Tuesday 21 Mar 2006 06:34 wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Now, there was a known issue with those cards with e1000 driver upto
kernel 2.6.11, IIRC.
Hmmm, and 2.6.12 panics (bug #327355 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
when I
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 02:09, Joey Hess wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
So what do you people suggest in such cases:
1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ?
2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ?
3) Buddy! We are all volunteers. Go and roll
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 00:08, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
On Saturday 18 March 2006 17:32, Roland Mas wrote:
Thaddeus H. Black, 2006-03-18 16:00:11 +0100 :
It appears that to have a Enterprise Grade Debian Distribution, we
need a SPOC [ed.: Single Point of Contact?] team which can address
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
So what do you people suggest in such cases:
1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ?
2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ?
3) Buddy! We are all volunteers. Go and roll your own kernel with the
patches ?
4) Wait! That hardware isn't officially
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:39:45PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
So what do you people suggest in such cases:
1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ?
2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ?
3) Buddy! We are all volunteers. Go and roll your own kernel with
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 02:09, Joey Hess wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
So what do you people suggest in such cases:
1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ?
2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ?
3) Buddy! We are all volunteers. Go and roll your own kernel with the
On Mar 20, Ritesh Raj Sarraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what do you people suggest in such cases:
If you need a distribution which supports modern hardware, then you
should switch to Ubuntu.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 02:09, Joey Hess wrote:
5) etch beta 2 was released last week with support for your
hardware
But there might have been many Debian Users who might have
discovered this issue earlier. What choice are they given ?
They
* Ritesh Raj Sarraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060320 22:14]:
RHEL and SLES do a damn good job of Hardware Bug Fixing and Feature
Enhancement for the software they ship.
Why can't we do it ? Is it just because our policy doesn't allow it ?
Can't we revise the policy ?
Of course policies can be
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 02:43:38 +0530, Ritesh wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 02:09, Joey Hess wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
So what do you people suggest in such cases:
1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ?
2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian
On 3/20/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:39:45PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
So what do you people suggest in such cases:
1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ?
2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ?
3) Buddy!
On 20 Mar 2006, Ritesh Raj Sarraf said this:
So what do you people suggest in such cases:
1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ?
2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ?
3) Buddy! We are all volunteers. Go and roll your own kernel with
the
patches ?
4) Wait! That hardware
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 01:01:28AM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On 3/20/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:39:45PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
So what do you people suggest in such cases:
1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Now, there was a known issue with those cards with e1000 driver upto kernel
2.6.11, IIRC.
Hmmm, and 2.6.12 panics (bug #327355 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
when I try and use the tape drive on my machine. New versions not only
fix bugs, but introduce new ones, too.
* Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-20 20:04]:
Hmmm, and 2.6.12 panics (bug #327355 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
when I try and use the tape drive on my machine. New versions not only
Anthony, do you still see this bug with 2.6.15 or (better yet) 2.6.16?
(will be uploaded tomorrow).
UBUNTU realy works, and is stable. I've instaled it on a few servers now, and i'm quite happy with it.but my question is. Why don't you just build your own kernel from source. download the vannilla souces and do it.
it's not that hard on debian. it's easier on gentoo, but in debian it's almost
* Rui Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-21 01:02]:
Since debian is build thru volunteer, why don't you contribute whith
something...
FWIW, kmuto-san has prepated sarge d-i images with a modern kernel:
http://kmuto.jp/b.cgi/debian/d-i-2615.htm
And backports.org has modern kernels for sarge.
--
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Anthony, do you still see this bug with 2.6.15 or (better yet) 2.6.16?
(will be uploaded tomorrow).
2.6.15, yes. I'll check 2.6.16 when it hits unstable (I'm guessing,
though I still need to test, that the ide-tape cleanup in 2.6.9 borked it)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
(dropping -curiosathe raised issue is a real issue)
which are known to work with Debian Stable?
5) etch beta 2 was released last week with support for your hardware
I'm not sure that many people are seriously considering an etch beta
to install as a client's firewall solution.
The
19 matches
Mail list logo
