On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 07:58:35 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 11:28:55PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> > This does not apply to our topic as well. These lists are not
>> > (publicly) archived (or am I missing something?)
>>
>> BTW, both gmane and the mail archive seem to b
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 11:28:55PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > This does not apply to our topic as well. These lists are not
> > (publicly) archived (or am I missing something?)
>
> BTW, both gmane and the mail archive seem to be archiving the bugs lists.
I have no idea why people are reall
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:15:34 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 01:56:16PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>> > > And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows
>> > > there address will be publi
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 01:56:16PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows there
> > > address
> > > will be published? We have several complaints a month about the probl
* Andreas Tille [2011-08-05 12:39]:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows there
> > address
> > will be published? We have several complaints a month about the problem.
>
> Please stick to the topic.
Andreas Tille schrieb am Friday, den 05. August 2011:
> [sorry for pressing wrong key and sending unfinished mail]
>
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows there
> > address
> > will be published? We h
[sorry for pressing wrong key and sending unfinished mail]
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows there address
> will be published? We have several complaints a month about the problem.
Please stick to the
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> And you are of course sure that everybody using reportbug knows there address
> will be published? We have several complaints a month about the problem.
Please stick to the topic. In this thread it is about mailing lists.
However,
Bernhard R. Link schrieb am Friday, den 05. August 2011:
> * Alexander Wirt [110804 11:30]:
> > P.S. I know its nice to be open. But publishing real names and mailaddresses
> > is a problem and at least problematic under german law (and probably for
> > other countries).
>
> While publishing rea
* Alexander Wirt [110804 11:30]:
> P.S. I know its nice to be open. But publishing real names and mailaddresses
> is a problem and at least problematic under german law (and probably for
> other countries).
While publishing real names and mailing addresses might be a problem,
publishing mails sen
Olly Betts schrieb am Friday, den 05. August 2011:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:01:22AM +, Cord Beermann wrote:
> > [we should seperate the GSoC-project from the ListArchiveSpam efforts]
>
> Indeed, I've dropped soc-coordination.
>
> > as i wrote the review-stuff explained in
> > http://wiki
Hiya,
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:34:45AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Olly Betts (o...@survex.com):
>
> > rather than having a separate flag state for those, but the reports have
> > been reviewed by a human, so should be higher quality than the
> > unfiltered reports from clicks on
Quoting Olly Betts (o...@survex.com):
> rather than having a separate flag state for those, but the reports have
> been reviewed by a human, so should be higher quality than the
> unfiltered reports from clicks on the "Spam" buttons.
Reports we get through the "Spam" buttons *are* reviewed by
hu
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:01:22AM +, Cord Beermann wrote:
> [we should seperate the GSoC-project from the ListArchiveSpam efforts]
Indeed, I've dropped soc-coordination.
> as i wrote the review-stuff explained in
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ListMaster/ListArchiveSpam#new_web-based_effort_
Hello Andreas Tille,
Am 2011-08-04 10:22:43, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> - Parse the existing mboxes and strip them down to the following
> information
>
> Message-id:
> From: Name of poster
> Date: Date
> Subject: Subject
> Content
> So far for the consens
Hallo! Du (Andreas Tille) hast geschrieben:
[we should seperate the GSoC-project from the ListArchiveSpam efforts]
> As far as I know it is not only Christian and if we really want to get
> more people involved into Debian (including non-technicans) tasks like
> cleaning up the list archive from
Andreas Tille schrieb am Thursday, den 04. August 2011:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:29:41AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > As far as I know it is not only Christian and if we really want to get
> > > more people involved into Debian (including non-technicans) tasks like
> > > cleaning up the
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:29:41AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > As far as I know it is not only Christian and if we really want to get
> > more people involved into Debian (including non-technicans) tasks like
> > cleaning up the list archive from SPAM might be somehow interesting.
> Yeah, but
Hi Alex,
Can we have some prototype/ format of the Message-IDs that you want us
to strip? It would be beneficial for both sides because then we can
show you what we will be handling and you can tell if something else
needs to be taken care of.
Thanks for the help,
--
Sukhbir
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Sukhbir Singh schrieb am Thursday, den 04. August 2011:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Can we have some prototype/ format of the Message-IDs that you want us
> to strip? It would be beneficial for both sides because then we can
> show you what we will be handling and you can tell if something else
> needs to be
Andreas Tille schrieb am Thursday, den 04. August 2011:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:02:20AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > > Just for the record. The mboxes are not for being published. We are
> > > > currently
> > > > working on getting more data privacy protection in the archive so just
>
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:02:20AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > Just for the record. The mboxes are not for being published. We are
> > > currently
> > > working on getting more data privacy protection in the archive so just
> > > publishing the mboxes would just be counterproductive.
> >
>
Andreas Tille schrieb am Thursday, den 04. August 2011:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 10:31:33AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > Just for the record. The mboxes are not for being published. We are
> > currently
> > working on getting more data privacy protection in the archive so just
> > publishing
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 10:31:33AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Just for the record. The mboxes are not for being published. We are currently
> working on getting more data privacy protection in the archive so just
> publishing the mboxes would just be counterproductive.
Thanks for clarifying th
Andreas Tille schrieb am Thursday, den 04. August 2011:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 09:44:49AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > We had an ongoing discussion about privacy and so
> > spam and so on about the mboxes. We even managed to get consense yesterday.
>
> To bring some light into this I would
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 09:44:49AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> We had an ongoing discussion about privacy and so
> spam and so on about the mboxes. We even managed to get consense yesterday.
To bring some light into this I would like to publish this consense we
had:
A filter needs to be writ
Christian PERRIER schrieb am Thursday, den 04. August 2011:
> (from soc-coordination)
>
> Quoting Sukhbir Singh (sukhbir...@gmail.com):
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is what we implemented during this time, in more detail:
> >
> > 1. Wrote a script that fetches messages for lists.debian.org from
> > Gma
Christian PERRIER schrieb am Thursday, den 04. August 2011:
> Quoting Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net):
>
> > To my knowledge you can download them via:
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/cgi-bin/mbox/-MM
>
>
> Indeed. Well, it seems that at least Sukhbir, /me and Andreas Tille
> were'nt a
Quoting Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net):
> To my knowledge you can download them via:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/cgi-bin/mbox/-MM
Indeed. Well, it seems that at least Sukhbir, /me and Andreas Tille
were'nt aware of this (for Sukhbir, that's understandable, for Andreas
and /me, only the
On 2011-08-04 09:16, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> (from soc-coordination)
>
> Quoting Sukhbir Singh (sukhbir...@gmail.com):
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is what we implemented during this time, in more detail:
>>
>> 1. Wrote a script that fetches messages for lists.debian.org from
>> Gmane and then creates a m
(from soc-coordination)
Quoting Sukhbir Singh (sukhbir...@gmail.com):
> Hi,
>
> Here is what we implemented during this time, in more detail:
>
> 1. Wrote a script that fetches messages for lists.debian.org from
> Gmane and then creates a mbox archive for them. This allows us to
I find it real
31 matches
Mail list logo