On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:23:32AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
Have you done any actual calculation on this? A quick Google search on SSD
write
cycles shows more articles debunking this theory than supporting it.
Reading specifications of intel's SSD 320 line at the following link:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:23:32AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
On 30/09/2012 18:49, Frank Bauer wrote:
Why not, my computer upgrade cycles are about 6-8 years and the
computer won't be idling all the time - especially considering modern
desktop environments running whole database engines
On 2012-10-01 13:32, Frank Bauer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:23:32AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
Have you done any actual calculation on this? A quick Google search on SSD
write
cycles shows more articles debunking this theory than supporting it.
Reading specifications of intel's
Hi,
On Montag, 1. Oktober 2012, Michael Hanke wrote:
Just a data point:
interesting, thanks.
what are the main (ssd related) advantages of running a 3.2 kernel instead of
the 2.6.32 from squeeze? (I don't want to run 3.2 due to wlan/intel gfx
problems, though last time I tried was three
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 03:37:19PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Montag, 1. Oktober 2012, Michael Hanke wrote:
Just a data point:
interesting, thanks.
what are the main (ssd related) advantages of running a 3.2 kernel
instead of the 2.6.32 from squeeze? (I don't want to run 3.2 due to
❦ 1 octobre 2012 18:26 CEST, Jonathan McDowell nood...@earth.li :
what are the main (ssd related) advantages of running a 3.2 kernel
instead of the 2.6.32 from squeeze? (I don't want to run 3.2 due to
wlan/intel gfx problems, though last time I tried was three months
ago, might been fixed
Frank == Frank Bauer frank.c.ba...@gmail.com writes:
Frank Hi, I am considering migrating my Debian testing system to a
Frank SSD to speed things up. Since SSD lifetime is severely
Frank limited (about 5000 overwrites for consumer grade MLC), I
Frank wanted to know beforehand,
]] Vincent Bernat
In case of ext4 over encrypted LVM, does the kernel have all the
discard/trim support? The Debian wiki says that LVM supports trim to
declare unused space with lvresize as an example. Does it include unused
space inside a logical volume?
Yes, but you need to enable it
Quoting Michael Hanke (m...@debian.org):
I'm on an Intel SSD (120GB) since Aug 2009 -- running Debian testing all
the time. I do not upgrade daily, but often. I have _not_ done any of
the optimizations mentioned on the wiki. I have on average approx 15GB
free on the drive. Obviously, I ran a
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:15:45PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
If you have 5000 erase cycles, it will run for 13 years if you overwrite
it once per day. Do you really expect this device to work until this?
Why not, my computer upgrade cycles are about 6-8 years and the
computer won't be idling
Relax :-)
It is a hardware problem.
Just keep doing your regular job till SDD become more robust.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 30/09/2012 18:49, Frank Bauer wrote:
Why not, my computer upgrade cycles are about 6-8 years and the
computer won't be idling all the time - especially considering modern
desktop environments running whole database engines to store
config/meta data.
Is writing of 160GB/day realistic?
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:26:57 +0200, Frank Bauer wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
I am considering migrating my Debian testing system to a SSD to speed things
up. Since SSD lifetime is severely limited (about 5000 overwrites for
consumer grade MLC), I wanted to know beforehand, how much writes does
my
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:26:57PM +0200, Frank Bauer wrote:
I am considering migrating my Debian testing system to a SSD to speed things
up.
Since SSD lifetime is severely limited (about 5000 overwrites for
consumer grade MLC), I wanted to know beforehand, how much writes does
my system
14 matches
Mail list logo
