Hi all,
I read this :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/
debian-devel-announce-200308/msg00010.html
So we should put development packages (like cvs snapshot) in experimental, not
in unstable. But there is a problem, and I don't find any solution to solve
it. For example, let's
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:09:57PM +0200, jjluza wrote:
The announcement tells we should get out -snapshot from the name of
the package, before puting it in experimental. So there is no
difference in the package name anymore. So now, since cvs package
version is 0.0.date, apt always ask for
Le Dimanche 21 Septembre 2003 20:14, Simon Law a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:09:57PM +0200, jjluza wrote:
The announcement tells we should get out -snapshot from the name of
the package, before puting it in experimental. So there is no
difference in the package name anymore. So
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, jjluza wrote:
I read this :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/
debian-devel-announce-200308/msg00010.html
So we should put development packages (like cvs snapshot) in experimental, not
in unstable. But there is a problem, and I don't find any solution
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:01:40PM +0200, jjluza [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard
to say:
Le Dimanche 21 Septembre 2003 20:14, Simon Law a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:09:57PM +0200, jjluza wrote:
The announcement tells we should get out -snapshot from the name of
the package, before
Le Dimanche 21 Septembre 2003 22:12, Santiago Vila a écrit :
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, jjluza wrote:
I read this :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/
debian-devel-announce-200308/msg00010.html
So we should put development packages (like cvs snapshot) in
experimental, not
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If the snaphots are betas for version 1.5, the solution is to give it
a version number like 2:1.4.20030921-1, so that whenever 1.5 is
officially released you can upload it to unstable as 2:1.5-1.
[ If the snapshots are betas for 1.4.1, use
On Sunday 21 September 2003 23:10, Remi Vanicat wrote:
Why use epoch ? 1.4.0.20030921-1 should work (or am i missing something
here ?)
epoch should only be used when needed...
and it is... since current mozilla package version is 2:1.4-4
Mike
--
I have sampled every language, french is my
8 matches
Mail list logo