Hi Dirk,
Sorry, I only just saw this message. I forgot to ask for a CC in my
original message.
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 20:22:01 + (UTC), Dirk Eddelbuettele...@debian.org
wrote:
Faheem Mitha faheem at faheem.info writes:
I'm sorry to hear that you will not be working on R packaging for
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:32:01PM +, Faheem Mitha wrote:
I had noticed you doing a lot of work on R packaging, and would like
to express my appreciation. I know much of the time packaging can seem
like hard and thankless work.
Having done several R packages myself I need to admit that
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 10:31:47PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
Charles' statement made me nervous because it sounds like he is saying
he's not interested in looking carefully enough to know which side of
any line he's on, and he wants to use Debian resources to redistribute
that lack of
]] Andreas Tille
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 10:31:47PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
Charles' statement made me nervous because it sounds like he is saying
he's not interested in looking carefully enough to know which side of
any line he's on, and he wants to use Debian resources to
Le Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:10:07PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
Not in the preferred form for modification means you're not distributing
the source. We don't do that.
Hi Tollef and everybody,
please, I would like people to accept that things are not black and white. In
preferred form
Faheem Mitha faheem at faheem.info writes:
I'm sorry to hear that you will not be working on R packaging for
Debian any more. Unfortunately. there are very few people working on R
packaging in Debian. There is Dirk, of course, but few other names
appear consistently. In particular, there is
Dirk Eddelbuettel edd at debian.org writes:
There is Don Armstrong's r-debian.debian.net which turns CRAN packages
Sorry: http://debian-r.debian.net/ is the correct address.
Dirk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi Charles (and everyone else),
On Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:28:11 +0900, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Paul, FTP team and everybody,
first, let me underline that if the FTP team wants to disuss and
amend its decision, I will be happy to participate.
I think that the only good
On 09/22/2013 05:31 AM, Stephen Gran wrote:
Charles' statement made me nervous because it sounds like he is saying
he's not interested in looking carefully enough
What Charles wrote, was that he has too much work and not enough time,
not that he is not interested in looking carefully enough.
On 13342 March 1977, Charles Plessy wrote:
I think that the only good solution is to engage with the R community and make
them change their practice of distributing data in binary format in the source
packages.
Thats a maintainers job. Feel free to do so, we won't hold you back.
I think
Le Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:08:27AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert a écrit :
Therefore, we shall consider these data files as preferred form of
modification if the data was captured in this format from a scientific
instrument, created manually and painstakingly by hand (this is not the
common case), or
This one time, at band camp, Charles Plessy said:
I therefore decided to stop uploading R packages to Debian. I use some of
these packages on multiple computers, and will keep on sharing my work with
others on Alioth, but that is all. For any of them where I was the sole
uploader, please
Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org writes:
This one time, at band camp, Charles Plessy said:
I therefore decided to stop uploading R packages to Debian. I use some
of these packages on multiple computers, and will keep on sharing my
work with others on Alioth, but that is all. For any of them
This one time, at band camp, Russ Allbery said:
Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org writes:
This one time, at band camp, Charles Plessy said:
I therefore decided to stop uploading R packages to Debian. I use some
of these packages on multiple computers, and will keep on sharing my
work with
Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org writes:
This one time, at band camp, Russ Allbery said:
Alioth already hosts non-free packages (such as packaging repositories
for Debian packaging for the non-free suite). I believe that the
current understanding is that Alioth and its associated systems, such
(On my phone)
The real question is it less *distributable*? If its GPL and contains
things *not* in preferred form, I'd say yes, that would be less
distributable, since its a GPL violation and results in breech of license -
which means we can't distribute.
My 2 cents (as a DD),
Paul
On Sep 21,
(as me, a DD, not as ftpteam)
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 04:59:55PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Hello FTP team and everybody,
Charles,
In the thread that you cite, I sent another email where I asked for:
- Time for a transition,
- Precise criteria,
Law isn't precise. I think you
Paul R. Tagliamonte paul...@gmail.com writes:
The real question is it less *distributable*? If its GPL and contains
things *not* in preferred form, I'd say yes, that would be less
distributable, since its a GPL violation and results in breech of
license - which means we can't distribute.
I
Hi Paul, FTP team and everybody,
first, let me underline that if the FTP team wants to disuss and amend its
decision, I will be happy to participate.
I think that the only good solution is to engage with the R community and make
them change their practice of distributing data in binary format in
Joerg Jaspert joerg at debian.org writes:
it came to our attention[0] that most R packages ship data files (*.Rda,
*.Rdata), which can contain a lot of different kind of data, from
command line instructions, to huge data tables, or even extra modules
loaded by means of install.packages()
Hi,
it came to our attention[0] that most R packages ship data files (*.Rda,
*.Rdata), which can contain a lot of different kind of data, from
command line instructions, to huge data tables, or even extra modules
loaded by means of install.packages() function.
It is common practice for R
21 matches
Mail list logo
