Excerpts from Ben Hutchings's message of Sun Apr 29 16:27:54 -0700 2012:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:11:08PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 21:52 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 09:51:37PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > >
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:36:58PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 20:30 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > OoO En ce doux début de matinée du lundi 30 avril 2012, vers 08:15,
> > Svante Signell disait :
> >
> > >> I'm rather sure that he wants to define booting as part of
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 20:30 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En ce doux début de matinée du lundi 30 avril 2012, vers 08:15,
> Svante Signell disait :
>
> >> I'm rather sure that he wants to define booting as part of what
> >> currently is done in /etc/rcS.d. Configuring the network or mo
* Vincent Bernat [2012-04-30 20:30 +0200]:
> OoO En ce doux début de matinée du lundi 30 avril 2012, vers 08:15,
> Svante Signell disait :
>
> >> I'm rather sure that he wants to define booting as part of what
> >> currently is done in /etc/rcS.d. Configuring the network or mounting
> >> non
OoO En ce doux début de matinée du lundi 30 avril 2012, vers 08:15,
Svante Signell disait :
>> I'm rather sure that he wants to define booting as part of what
>> currently is done in /etc/rcS.d. Configuring the network or mounting
>> non-essential remote file systems wouldn't be part of thi
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 23:48 +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> * Svante Signell [2012-04-29 21:51 +0200]:
> > In line with the recent discussion, lets aim at defining what _boot_ is:
>
> I'm rather sure that he wants to define booting as part of what
> currently is done in /etc/rcS.d. Configuring the ne
x27;s not network booting.
I have no idea where you pulled your definition of _boot_ out from, but my
definition of _boot_ is the process of initializing hardware, and starting up
every service needed to get the machine into its usual running state.
From wikipedia:
> In computing, booting (also kno
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:11:08PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 21:52 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 09:51:37PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > In line with the recent discussion, lets aim at defining what _boot_ is:
> > [...]
* Svante Signell [2012-04-29 21:51 +0200]:
> In line with the recent discussion, lets aim at defining what _boot_ is:
I'm rather sure that he wants to define booting as part of what
currently is done in /etc/rcS.d. Configuring the network or mounting
non-essential remote file systems wouldn't be
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 21:52 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 09:51:37PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In line with the recent discussion, lets aim at defining what _boot_ is:
> [...]
>
> No, let's not. Beyond RAM, CPU, IRQ controllers and timers (all
> of w
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 09:51:37PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In line with the recent discussion, lets aim at defining what _boot_ is:
[...]
No, let's not. Beyond RAM, CPU, IRQ controllers and timers (all
of which are part of the kernel's early initialisation) pretty
much all of t
Svante Signell wrote:
> In line with the recent discussion, lets aim at defining what _boot_ is:
Why? Unless you are suggesting documentation is unclear, I don't see
how this has any impact on the development of Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hello,
In line with the recent discussion, lets aim at defining what _boot_ is:
- initializing the RAM: yes
- initializing the CPU(s): yes
- loading the kernel: yes
- initializing the graphics card: yes for text mode, graphics mode can
come later
- initializing the HDD(s): yes, if boot devices.
-
13 matches
Mail list logo
