Bug#405358: ITP: freedict-tools -- Development files for the FreeDict dictionary packages

2007-01-02 Thread Joost van Baal
Description : Development files for the FreeDict dictionary packages This package contains the scripts for developing and building FreeDict dictionary packages. The proposed name of the binary package produced by this source package is freedict-tools-dev. Currently, the dict-freedict-eng-deu

make dictionary packages support stardict

2006-09-08 Thread Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
binary dictionary format instead. Currently we have gtk, gnome and console version of stardict in the archive, and the stardict-dictionary virtual package, but none of the dictionary packages supports it. To provide dictionary data for stardict, we can convert the original DICT dictionary

Re: aspell dictionary packages fail to build

2005-07-17 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:34:05PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: Howdy, The aspell dictionary packages build-depend on aspell-bin ( 0.60). aspell-bin is now a virtual package provided by aspell, but virtual packages cannot be versioned, so these build-dependency cannot be satisfied

Re: aspell dictionary packages fail to build

2005-07-16 Thread Matt Kraai
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 05:01:03PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: The aspell dictionary packages build-depend on aspell-bin ( 0.60). aspell-bin is now a virtual package provided by aspell, but virtual packages cannot be versioned, so these build-dependency cannot be satisfied

Re: aspell dictionary packages fail to build

2005-07-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 05:01:03PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: The aspell dictionary packages build-depend on aspell-bin ( 0.60). aspell-bin is now a virtual package provided by aspell, but virtual packages cannot be versioned, so these build

Re: aspell dictionary packages fail to build

2005-07-15 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, The aspell dictionary packages build-depend on aspell-bin ( 0.60). aspell-bin is now a virtual package provided by aspell, but virtual packages cannot be versioned, so these build-dependency cannot be satisfied. There are fifteen such packages: I'd see a benefit in filing mail

Re: aspell dictionary packages fail to build

2005-07-15 Thread Agustin Martin
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:34:05PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: Howdy, The aspell dictionary packages build-depend on aspell-bin ( 0.60). aspell-bin is now a virtual package provided by aspell, but virtual packages cannot be versioned, so these build-dependency cannot be satisfied. That should

aspell dictionary packages fail to build

2005-07-14 Thread Matt Kraai
Howdy, The aspell dictionary packages build-depend on aspell-bin ( 0.60). aspell-bin is now a virtual package provided by aspell, but virtual packages cannot be versioned, so these build-dependency cannot be satisfied. There are fifteen such packages: aspell-br aspell-cy aspell-de aspell-de

Re: Dictionary Packages

1998-04-13 Thread Bob Hilliard
David Frey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Personally I'd prefer to have additional packages dictd-web1913, dictd-foldoc, dictd-... (depending on dictd), That's exactly what I had in mind. Sorry if my message left the wrong impression. I envisage four source packages and seven or eight binary

Dictionary Packages

1998-04-12 Thread Bob Hilliard
I have just packaged dictd, containing client/server software for accessing dictionaries. To do anything useful, the server must have dictionaries and indices in a suitable format. There are eight dictionaries available from the same site that provides the source for the

Re: Dictionary Packages

1998-04-12 Thread G John Lapeyre
I like the idea of having all the material available in a form that is as convenient as possible (ie alread .deb) . But this is similar to the problem of packaging large scientific packages which are interesting to only a limited number of people. (similar, but different reasons

Re: Dictionary Packages

1998-04-12 Thread David Frey
On Sat, Apr 11, 1998 at 10:23:45PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote: I would like to package these eight dictionaries to accompany dictd, but if there is a policy against such large text packages, I could make installer packages to format and install the tarballs that are available for anonymous