reassign 128377 gdk-imlib1
thanks
SMR == Steve M Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
reassign 128377 gnome-help
thanks
Hi Folks,
GNOME's imlib1 library is linked with libpng2, and nobody
knows how to gracefully handle the change from libpng2--libpng3
SMR == Steve M Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:09:08PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
[...]
I really want to know why recompiling gdk-imlib1 is too hard ?
Recompiling isn't hard. Managing the transition is hard. Did you
read the threads in debian-devel and
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:09:08PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
reassign 128377 gdk-imlib1
thanks
Now, the question is: should GNOME move to libpng3, and how? The QT/KDE
folks have sidestepped the problem by declaring that libqt2 is
remaining linked against libpng2, while libqt3
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:23:25PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
SMR == Steve M Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:09:08PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
[...]
I really want to know why recompiling gdk-imlib1 is too hard ?
Recompiling isn't hard.
SMR == Steve M Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
The fact remains that we cannot change the linkage of the library
NOR of applications piecemeal. The changes must be coordinated.
In the absence of a transition plan, I see no reason to introduce
instability in GNOME by changing
On 09 Jan 2002 15:09:08 +0100
Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, the question is: should GNOME move to libpng3, and how? The QT/KDE
folks have sidestepped the problem by declaring that libqt2 is
remaining linked against libpng2, while libqt3 links with libpng3. I
don't see
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:37:17PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
SMR == Steve M Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
The fact remains that we cannot change the linkage of the library
NOR of applications piecemeal. The changes must be coordinated.
In the absence of a transition
SMR == Steve M Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:37:17PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
[...]
See Colin's answer. Change the library soname and shlibs. This will
solve this bug.
It's a reasonable transition plan.
However, introducing a new imlib library with
Hi,
FWIW, the solution we're planning for Red Hat is to create a symlink
libpng10.so to the old libpng, then link imlib and gnome-libs
against -lpng10. This way the ABI of imlib/gnome-libs is preserved,
but -lpng can be moved to libpng3.
I'll attach the imlib and gnome-libs patches. (This step
Steve M. Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:23:25PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
SMR == Steve M Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:09:08PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
[...]
I really want to know why recompiling
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:37:17PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
SMR == Steve M Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The fact remains that we cannot change the linkage of the library
NOR of applications piecemeal. The changes must be coordinated.
In the absence of a transition plan, I see
11 matches
Mail list logo