On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:25 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
sooo... although the situation *right now* is that nobody in the
commercial world is the slightest bit interested in LSB because they
all do custom builds of complete software stacks, it could be said
that *if* the free
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
In my experience anyone distributing binaries actually picks a small
set of distros and builds for those explicitly, rather than relying
on the LSB. Does that mean that it's not actually useful in the real
world? I guess in a
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:32:18AM +0900, David Rusling wrote:
On 06/01/11 01:22, Wookey wrote:
As this is a non-trivial amount of work, the question then arises,
does anyone care about this enough to actually do the work? Linaro is
an obvious organisation that could expend some engineering
On 06/01/2011 07:25 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
so in _that_ regard, the question becomes: are the efforts of the
free software community better off being spent elsewhere? and what
benefit is there *TO THE FREE SOFTWARE COMMUNITY* of doing LSB for
ARM? forget the proprietary
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
l...@lkcl.net wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
In my experience anyone distributing binaries actually picks a small
set of distros and builds for those explicitly, rather than relying
on the
At the risk of overstating the obvious, there are also ABI guarantees
at stake here, which in my mind are architecture agnostic. OpenGL
applications need to know which bits (API functions) of which core
versions can be expected to be resolved during load time and which
must be queried through
Steve,
thanks, have a poke around and tell me / OCTO what it means to join
in, what the costs and benefits are etc...
Dave
On 06/01/11 22:36, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:32:18AM +0900, David Rusling wrote:
On 06/01/11 01:22, Wookey wrote:
As this is a non-trivial
[Apologies for the wide distibution of this mail (Debian, Ubuntu and
Fedora main+arm dev lists, plus linaro and lsb) but it's useful to
catch people who care about this issue enough to do some work. Do
please bear the distribution in mind when replying, focussing any
detailed discussion on
Wookey,
the short answer is 'yes'. The next question is 'who?'.Maybe
this can be bolted onto the hard float work, I'll let Konstantinos and
Steve respond...
Dave
On 06/01/11 01:22, Wookey wrote:
[Apologies for the wide distibution of this mail (Debian, Ubuntu and
Fedora main+arm
9 matches
Mail list logo
