Re: Does anyone use barrendero, or know of an equivalent?

2003-08-22 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003, Steve Langasek wrote: http://zoy.org/~sam/debian/barrendero_1.0-1.1.diff.gz I haven't contacted the maintainer yet because I was working on other bugs, but if he is MIA as you seem to be suggesting, I'll probably upload that NMU to DELAYED quite soon. Ok,

Re: Does anyone use barrendero, or know of an equivalent?

2003-08-21 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Hello, The package barrendero is a candidate for removal from testing. It has I had a quick look at the BTS and it seems that the two RC bugs may be easily fixed (one is a missing Build-Depends on debhelper, the other an error in debian/rules for

Re: Does anyone use barrendero, or know of an equivalent?

2003-08-21 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003, Steve Langasek wrote: But descriptions can be deceiving. Does anyone use this package who could comment on its reliability? Does the lack of other bugs indicate that the software is mature and stable, or unused? I am trying barrendero but don't trust it enough yet

Re: Does anyone use barrendero, or know of an equivalent?

2003-08-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:42:28AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote: On Wed, Aug 20, 2003, Steve Langasek wrote: But descriptions can be deceiving. Does anyone use this package who could comment on its reliability? Does the lack of other bugs indicate that the software is mature and stable, or

Does anyone use barrendero, or know of an equivalent?

2003-08-20 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello, The package barrendero is a candidate for removal from testing. It has two RC bugs, no response from the maintainer, and the upstream website seems to have vanished (the maintainer is also upstream). It seems like a useful tool: Description: Deletes messages on the spool dir depending