Stephen Zander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John == John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Indeed. It happened to me again today.
While watching my laptop shut-down last night, I noticed that mountd nsfd
*do* get stopped prior to the PCMCIA shutdown.
This is only for NFS server;
John == John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Indeed. It happened to me again today.
While watching my laptop shut-down last night, I noticed that mountd nsfd
*do* get stopped prior to the PCMCIA shutdown.
Maybe they're just not getting stopped hard enough :)
--
Stephen
---
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I actually originally reported it against sysvinit but he reassigned
it to mount. I have set its priority to critical because it can (and
HAS!) cause extensive data loss; definately not a wishlist issue!
I will let the mount
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Goerzen) wrote on 10.04.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Therefore, I believe it would be prudent, as a temporary workaround
for the kernel bug, to umount all local drives before umounting
network drives. It is generally not a
Stephen Zander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, that won't work if the NFS mounts live below the local mounts in
the file-system tree. The local mounts will report busy.
Blat. You're right.
John * When I shutdown my desktop, it will hang trying to
John umount.
I suggest looking
John == John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
John not umount local drives. Therefore, I believe it would be
John prudent, as a temporary workaround for the kernel bug, to
John umount all local drives before umounting network drives. It
No, that won't work if the NFS mounts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Goerzen) wrote on 10.04.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Therefore, I believe it would be prudent, as a temporary workaround
for the kernel bug, to umount all local drives before umounting
network drives. It is generally not a big deal if a network drive
doesn't get umounted
[Following up on debian-devel]
On Thu, 9 Apr 1998, John Goerzen wrote:
I reported a similar bug 33 days ago against mount (#19039). It has been
ignored by the maintainer of mount. I warned then, and I repeat today,
that this bug CAN and DOES cause filesystem corruption!
This bug relates
Vincent Renardias [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(speaking a 'mount' maintainer)
I agree crash disks aren't fun at all, however from this email and from
your previous bug report, I fail to see where 'mount' is involved in this
infortunate process:
Thanks for your reply, Vincent It would
9 matches
Mail list logo