Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not if you use pdebuild or similarly build in a chroot, which IMO
everyone should be doing.
I use xen instances and that changes nothing at all.
1. My ~/src is
| http://p12n.org/
debuild; debuild -S; debdiff should give zero changes. Often enough
that isn't true though.
Being pedantic doesn't help if nobody fixes the bugs. Only about half of
the ~400 FTBFS if built twice in a row bugs have been fixed so far[0].
So if you want to move forward
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This check would fail many packages that can still be built twice in a
row (any package that runs autotools during the build process without
doing a complicated dance
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Lucas Nussbaum]
The problem is that it isn't required to have exactly the same source
tree after ./configure ; make ; make clean. It's just required that
./configure ; make ; make clean ; ./configure ; make works. It is
possible that the first build
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not if you use pdebuild or similarly build in a chroot, which IMO
everyone should be doing.
I use xen instances and that changes nothing at all.
1. My ~/src is mounted inside the build environment so I
[Lucas Nussbaum]
The problem is that it isn't required to have exactly the same source
tree after ./configure ; make ; make clean. It's just required that
./configure ; make ; make clean ; ./configure ; make works. It is
possible that the first build modifies some files, but that the package
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:50:52AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This check would fail many packages that can still be built twice in a
row (any package that runs autotools during the build process without
doing a complicated dance to preserve
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gerard Lledó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My understanding of debian is far from being complete, but in order to
be built for a second time a clean is performed before (at least, using
debuild). So directory should look like a fresh $ apt-get source
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This check would fail many packages that can still be built twice in a
row (any package that runs autotools during the build process without
doing a complicated dance to preserve the upstream-shipped files,
Hi,
I've been looking for FTBFS bugs in the BTS and I've noticed that
there are lots of FTBFS if built twice.
My understanding of debian is far from being complete, but in order to
be built for a second time a clean is performed before (at least,
using debuild). So directory should look like a
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Gerard Lledó wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking for FTBFS bugs in the BTS and I've noticed that
there are lots of FTBFS if built twice.
My understanding of debian is far from being complete, but in order to
be built for a second time a clean is performed before (at least,
Hi,
I've been looking for FTBFS bugs in the BTS and I've noticed that
there are lots of FTBFS if built twice.
My understanding of debian is far from being complete, but in order to
be built for a second time a clean is performed before (at least,
using debuild). So directory should look
Gerard Lledó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My understanding of debian is far from being complete, but in order to
be built for a second time a clean is performed before (at least, using
debuild). So directory should look like a fresh $ apt-get source
packagename. And the contents of the files
* Santiago Vila [Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:58:13 +0200]:
Consider the case where the .diff.gz for a package updates a .po file but
not the corresponding .mo file (which are usually included in the original
tarball as well).
You need to run ./configure at least to be able to run the clean target,
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Santiago Vila [Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:58:13 +0200]:
I don't know how much typical this example is, but the two can't build
twice in a row bugs I got were like that.
The you should/could remove the .mo files in your debian/rules clean
target.
On 6/29/07, Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Santiago Vila [Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:58:13 +0200]:
I don't know how much typical this example is, but the two can't build
twice in a row bugs I got were like that.
The you should/could remove the
16 matches
Mail list logo
