-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/03/14 22:14, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 09:49:44PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 07:41:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> I can understand the ftp team's desire to sidestep any moral
>>> questions
On 13529 March 1977, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I can understand the ftp team's desire to sidestep any moral questions here,
> but in the process I think your guidelines have wound up vague and
> overbroad, as they suggest that as a project we will never take a stand for
> anything but only do what's
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 09:49:44PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 07:41:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I can understand the ftp team's desire to sidestep any moral questions here,
> > but in the process I think your guidelines have wound up vague and
> > overbroad, as the
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 07:41:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I can understand the ftp team's desire to sidestep any moral questions here,
> but in the process I think your guidelines have wound up vague and
> overbroad, as they suggest that as a project we will never take a stand for
> an
Hi Joerg,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 09:11:16PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Those are just two examples - we sure could go and write down some
> more. But they are examples: we can't foresee all the possible content
> someone may propose.
> So instead, we have a simple set of questions that should
On 13526 March 1977, Ming-ting Wei wrote:
> Distributing pornography in academic network in Taiwan seems like a gray
> area. http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/EngLawContent.aspx?Type=E&id=2
Nice for them, but thats a minority.
> If it can be distributed from a separate repo it should be fine, but I also
On 13525 March 1977, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> If you can answer these questions with a yes or even a maybe - don't
> While I did agree mostly with this. I believe the last sentence should
> be reworded. Because aircrack-ng, crack or rarcrack could 'maybe' harm
> Debian/mirrors or derivatives.
>
Distributing pornography in academic network in Taiwan seems like a gray
area. http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/EngLawContent.aspx?Type=E&id=2
If it can be distributed from a separate repo it should be fine, but I also
wonder how many mirrors are under the place where pornography is not
allowed to distri
On 3/24/14, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
[...]
> So instead, we have a simple set of questions that should be applied,
> helping to judge contents before upload:
>
> - Is it likely illegal in the majority of the countries of our
>Developers?
>
> - Will it harm Debian, our mirrors, derivatives or use
Thank you Joerg
Makes very good sense to me.
On 24 March 2014 20:11, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Triggered by the discussion to include a controversial "visual novel" in
> the Debian archive, we feel that a statement from the ftpteam on what is
> considered acceptable for the archive is ca
10 matches
Mail list logo
