> -----Original Message----- > From: Bryant,Susan,GREENWICH,Information Services > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 1:24 PM > To: Winters,John,GREENWICH,Information Services > Subject: RE: Resolved Deduction Report > > Thanks for confirming. I think we will just leave it lie unless someone > else complains. I had just never seen these results before. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Winters,John,GREENWICH,Information Services > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 1:22 PM > To: Bryant,Susan,GREENWICH,Information Services; > Melody,Thomas,GREENWICH,Information Services > Cc: Daley,Tom,GREENWICH,Information Services > Subject: RE: Resolved Deduction Report > > You are correct - it is not finding any RV documents and is bypassing the > Customer and Hierarchy read routines. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryant,Susan,GREENWICH,Information Services > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 1:19 PM > To: Winters,John,GREENWICH,Information Services; > Melody,Thomas,GREENWICH,Information Services > Cc: Daley,Tom,GREENWICH,Information Services > Subject: RE: Resolved Deduction Report > > I've figured it out. When the only deductions that are cleared are those > cleared through FI rather than SD then for some reason the program does > not hit the section where name texts are brought in. This is not perfect > but no one in the field has had an issue with it yet (it's been like this > for over 2 years). The only time this will happen is in the first couple > of days of the month when Unearned Cash Discounts and Ded below the ded > tolerance are cleared. In the past months when I've run this in the first > three days, there has always been at least one SD document which makes the > program hit the section that pulls in names. In the perfect world, they > wouldn't clear anything in the first couple of days (deduction activity is > supposed to be frozen) but this never happens. > > At this point I don't think we need to change anything. With this report > we can do more harm than good sometimes. We may want to look at it when > we make adjustments with the new unauthorized deduction project. > > Thanks. > Sue > > -----Original Message----- > From: Winters,John,GREENWICH,Information Services > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:33 AM > To: Melody,Thomas,GREENWICH,Information Services; > Bryant,Susan,GREENWICH,Information Services > Cc: Daley,Tom,GREENWICH,Information Services > Subject: RE: Resolved Deduction Report > > Fortunately or Unfortunately - nothing has changed. This is the only > version of the program. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Melody,Thomas,GREENWICH,Information Services > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 5:06 PM > To: Bryant,Susan,GREENWICH,Information Services; > Winters,John,GREENWICH,Information Services > Cc: Daley,Tom,GREENWICH,Information Services > Subject: FW: Resolved Deduction Report > > > > Sue, > > We may have inadvertently caused an issue here with our change to > the download program. > I am assigning this program to John with top priority to implement > the new Z_NWNA_DOWNLOAD , > and make sure this issue is corrected. > > Tom > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryant,Susan,GREENWICH,Information Services > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:15 PM > To: Melody,Thomas,GREENWICH,Information Services > Cc: Daley,Tom,GREENWICH,Information Services > Subject: Resolved Deduction Report > > Tom, > > I'm getting output for this report that I have never seen before. > If I run the report for Clearing Date 10/31/03. The download is fine. If > I run the report for Clearing Dates 11/01/03-11/03/03 then the download is > missing the partner names and hierarchy names. > > I've created two variants for you to look at in PRD. Run ZDEDSRPT > with variant 10/31/03 then variant 11/01/03 and you will see the output I > am getting. You need to delete or rename the first spreadsheet before > running the second. You can run them in foreground if you like. They > don't take too long. > > Could you please help me understand what has changed??? > > Thanks, > Sue
