Re: First experience with gcc-3.2 recompiles

2002-08-28 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Sunday 25 August 2002 22:00, you wrote: > Gerhard Tonn wrote: > > As I have told in another thread, I am currently rebuilding all packages > > depending on c++ on s390. All packages have been touched now. The results > > are: > > > > 406 packages have been built successfully > > 222 packages dep

Re: First experience with gcc-3.2 recompiles

2002-08-26 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Monday 26 August 2002 18:55, you wrote: > On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Gerhard Tonn wrote: > > > apt: failed with "debian/rules:20: build/environment.mak: No such file > > > or directory" gg: failed with "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljpeg" > > > hylafax: failed because textfmt wasn't built[1] > > > latte:

Re: First experience with gcc-3.2 recompiles

2002-08-26 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Gerhard Tonn wrote: > > apt: failed with "debian/rules:20: build/environment.mak: No such file or > > directory" gg: failed with "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljpeg" > > hylafax: failed because textfmt wasn't built[1] > > latte: failed with "Your STL string implementation is unu

Re: First experience with gcc-3.2 recompiles

2002-08-26 Thread Gerhard Tonn
On Sunday 25 August 2002 22:00, you wrote: > > > The build logs of the packages can be found at > > http://people.debian.org/~gt/gcc-3.2_transition > > I hate to say, but the list of failed packages needs to get > investigated a little bit, since not all failures seem to be GCC 3.2 > and syntax rel

Re: First experience with gcc-3.2 recompiles

2002-08-25 Thread Martin Schulze
Gerhard Tonn wrote: > As I have told in another thread, I am currently rebuilding all packages > depending on c++ on s390. All packages have been touched now. The results are: > > 406 packages have been built successfully > 222 packages depend on other packages built with gcc-3.2 >90 on q

re: First experience with gcc-3.2 recompiles

2002-08-23 Thread Jack Howarth
Gerhard, I would be cautious about installing a gcc-3.2-built glibc unless you first purge your system of all binaries that were built with gcc < 3.1. Jakub Jelinek said he was uncertain if s390/s390x was an arch that would require a libgcc-compat be added to glibc. If a libgcc-compat is require

First experience with gcc-3.2 recompiles

2002-08-23 Thread Gerhard Tonn
As I have told in another thread, I am currently rebuilding all packages depending on c++ on s390. All packages have been touched now. The results are: 406 packages have been built successfully 222 packages depend on other packages built with gcc-3.2 90 on qt libraries 12 on libsigc