* Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000831 20:47]:
If Debian decides to reject IMAPD and tells the U of W so,
that will put some pressure on them to clarify the license.
Otherwise they may prefer to leave it
unclear in order to to have it both ways.
I don't see why Debian (or GNU, or Linux)
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Sven Guckes wrote:
I don't see why Debian (or GNU, or Linux)
bothers with the IMAPD of UofW so much at all.
Aren't there quite some replacements by now?
Nope. Not that are free software and/or full-featured. Yet we're up to
our armpits in crappy POP3 servers with more
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 03:39:05PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
I don't see why Debian (or GNU, or Linux) bothers with the IMAPD of
UofW so much at all. Aren't there quite some replacements by now?
[1] The copyright appears to meet our standards (DFSG).
[2] The only alternative imap daemon
3 matches
Mail list logo
