Forwarding a bit of my answer on this. I don’t know what to
think about how this criticism immediately raises responses
like the two I already got, yet the other person in question
is allowed to disrespect his fellow DDs and just ignore the
fixes for real-world, although minority, problems.
I
Hi,
Thorsten Glaser:
I deliberately used an extremely few insulting word for this
You should have deliberated a bit more, then.
The only acceptable concrete value for 'extremely few' is Zero.
--
-- Matthias Urlichs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:41:30PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Thorsten Glaser:
I deliberately used an extremely few insulting word for this
You should have deliberated a bit more, then.
The only acceptable concrete value for 'extremely few' is Zero.
I'd say losing patience is quite
Hi,
Adam Borowski:
The only acceptable concrete value for 'extremely few' is Zero.
I'd say losing patience is quite understandable in this case
Probably. However, the context of this thread was not at all about a
maintainer who refused to apply a perfectly sensible patch. Getting
confronted
Le Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 06:07:19PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
I deliberately used an extremely few insulting word for this
but I don’t know how to else express it. And I do not believe
in staying quiet if it can’t be politely expressed, because,
let’s face it, the real world *is* full
5 matches
Mail list logo
