Re: Fwknop: Layout suggestions for a future implementation

2009-09-04 Thread Franck Joncourt
Manoj Srivastava wrote: On Thu, Sep 03 2009, Franck Joncourt wrote: At a first glance there is no need to split it, and all of the binary packages could be created from one source package as you mentionned. However, for other distributions than Debian I do not know how their packaging stuff

Re: Fwknop: Layout suggestions for a future implementation

2009-09-03 Thread Franck Joncourt
Manoj Srivastava wrote: On Wed, Sep 02 2009, Franck Joncourt wrote: I have got one tarball from upstream which is separated in fwknop-client and fwknop-server. The programs are mainly implemented in perl. Upstream is now working on rewriting it in C. Thus we have now a brand new tarball

Re: Fwknop: Layout suggestions for a future implementation

2009-09-03 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Thu, Sep 03 2009, Franck Joncourt wrote: Manoj Srivastava wrote: On Wed, Sep 02 2009, Franck Joncourt wrote: I have got one tarball from upstream which is separated in fwknop-client and fwknop-server. The programs are mainly implemented in perl. Upstream is now working on rewriting it

Fwknop: Layout suggestions for a future implementation

2009-09-02 Thread Franck Joncourt
(Upstream is CCed, please keep it that way) PS: Mail previously sent to debian-mentor, but I did not get any answers, therefore I try on devel. Hi, I am the maintainer of fwknop: http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fwknop.html The FireWall KNock OPerator implements an authorization scheme called

Re: Fwknop: Layout suggestions for a future implementation

2009-09-02 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, Sep 02 2009, Franck Joncourt wrote: I have got one tarball from upstream which is separated in fwknop-client and fwknop-server. The programs are mainly implemented in perl. Upstream is now working on rewriting it in C. Thus we have now a brand new tarball available known as