On 09 Aug 2003 05:11:39 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>ifupdown surely looks bad.
Shouldn't someone else take over the package then?
Greetings
Marc, not feeling fit to take the package, but seriously thinking
about a fork
--
-- !! No
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:39:52 +0100, Andrew Suffield
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
> >
> >ppp *was* unmaintained, for a long period of
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 05:34:20AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> If you actually dig into the list, you'll find that many of the bugs
> with patches fall into the same category as these two. Most of the
> rest actually need significant attention
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:25:21PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:39:52 +0100, Andrew Suffield
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
> >
> >ppp *was* unmaintained,
At Thu, 7 Aug 2003 18:25:27 -0400,
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> However, not having enough time to chase down important bugs is no
> excuse for not reviewing simple patches to fix simple bugs, which
> doesn't take an awful lot of time at all. (It is a good excuse for not
> reviewing complicated or
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:40:18PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 07, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Do you think any DD reads those? Do DDs care about Bugs with patches?
> >And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
> ppp actually appears to be unmaintained. Many
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 20:40, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 07, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >Do you think any DD reads those? Do DDs care about Bugs with patches?
> >And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
>
> ppp actually appears to be unmaintained. Many users requested
On Aug 07, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Do you think any DD reads those? Do DDs care about Bugs with patches?
>And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
ppp actually appears to be unmaintained. Many users requested essential
features like pppoa and kernel space pppoe su
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:39:52 +0100, Andrew Suffield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
>
>ppp *was* unmaintained, for a long period of time.
When exactly is a package (take ifupdown for
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 05:34:20AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > It's not like a developer could do anything more, in these two
>
> That being true still doesn't help non DDs to contribute.
Indeed, but it also means that they are not reasons why people should
be given accounts.
> > case
* (Nathanael Nerode)
| However, not having enough time to chase down important bugs is no
| excuse for not reviewing simple patches to fix simple bugs, which
| doesn't take an awful lot of time at all. (It is a good excuse for not
| reviewing complicated or subtle patches.)
Once you have man
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:52:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Good grief, how easy do we have to make it?
> > >
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch
> > >
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > >
> > > > Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:52:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Good grief, how easy do we have to make it?
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=&include=patch
> >
> > See the form at
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:25:27PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >glibc is even worse. It has multiple maintainers, and they still don't
> >have enough time to chase down all the important bugs, let alone
> >insignificant ones like this.
>
> This is unfortunately true;
Andrew Suffield wrote:
>glibc is even worse. It has multiple maintainers, and they still don't
>have enough time to chase down all the important bugs, let alone
>insignificant ones like this.
This is unfortunately true; glibc seems to be severely broken on a
routine basis upstream. Kinda makes m
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
> > > access to packages with patch
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
> > access to packages with patches pending would be a start.
>
> Good grief, how easy do we have to make it?
>
>
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
> > access to packages with patches pending would be a start. Or a system
>
> Try http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
> access to packages with patches pending would be a start.
Good grief, how easy do we have to make it?
http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch
http://bugs.debian.
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
> access to packages with patches pending would be a start. Or a system
Try http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch .
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, li
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Moin Goswin!
> Goswin von Brederlow schrieb am Thursday, den 07. August 2003:
>
> > > > Working on boot-floppies and debian-installer is not realy fruitfull
> > > > as non-DD. cvs access goes a long way there.
> > >
> > > I must have severe reading and
22 matches
Mail list logo
