Hi *,
I just wanted to report the current status of the Ghostscript 6.0
package. I made a first version without all the patches applied to
the elder releases (I wanted to have something working first).
I will now continue to reapply the patches to the new Ghostscript.
As soon as I have a
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Eh? There would be no real code changes at all. As I understand it, the
> license on 5.5 is all that has changed. So why not move it from non-free
> to main for potato?
Hi Branden,
if you look at the mail below, you can see that this discussion is
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 06:59:01AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Eh? There would be no real code changes at all. As I understand it, the
> > license on 5.5 is all that has changed. So why not move it from non-free
> > to main for potato?
>
> The Rel
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > AFAIK pdftotext is included in xpdf - it's not part of gs 5.5. The
> > differences
> > between 5.10 and 5.50 are not that big and I do not want to risk a stable
> > package just for being up to date.
>
> Eh? There would be no real code changes a
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 05:25:42PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 08:19:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > As I understand it, pdftotext is a new tool available in 5.5 but not 5.0.
>
> AFAIK pdftotext is included in xpdf - it's not part of gs 5.5. The differenc
On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 08:19:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> As I understand it, pdftotext is a new tool available in 5.5 but not 5.0.
AFAIK pdftotext is included in xpdf - it's not part of gs 5.5. The differences
between 5.10 and 5.50 are not that big and I do not want to risk a stable
6 matches
Mail list logo
