Hi,
I'm requesting giram (giram, giram-gnome, giram-mesa, giram-gnome-mesa)
to be removed from Debian for the following reasons:
- the upstream author is not responsive (possibly because he's working at
MadrakeSoft)
- it's development is very slow (8 months between 0.1.7 and 0.1.8)
On Mon, 07 May 2001, Jérôme Marant wrote:
I'm requesting giram (giram, giram-gnome, giram-mesa, giram-gnome-mesa)
to be removed from Debian for the following reasons:
Jérôme, could you please file a ITO (intent to orphan) or maybe even a O:
(orphaned) bug against wnpp for giram* ? The
Jérôme, could you please file a ITO (intent to orphan) or maybe even a
O:
(orphaned) bug against wnpp for giram* ? The instructions on bug
severity
and how to do it are in http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp. If you've
already
done that, I apologise for the nitpick.
I did not orphan it
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
...
Jérôme, could you please file a ITO (intent to orphan) or maybe even a O:
...
s/ITO/RFA/
(Request for adoption)
cu
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie
On Monday 07 May 2001 19:55, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Jérôme, could you please file a ITO (intent to orphan) or maybe even a
O:
(orphaned) bug against wnpp for giram* ? The instructions on bug
severity
and how to do it are in http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp. If you've
already
done
En réponse à Peter S Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hope you're not relying on this message to get the packages
removed. You need to file a bug report against ftp.debian.org
(but I'm sure you know that! I'm just making sure.)
Yes, I know this is not the standard procedure. This is just a
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just in case you haven't done so, the standard way to remove a package
is to file a bug against the package ftp.debian.org with subject like
Please remove giram packages from the archive, and then list the exact
pacakages in the body.
There has been a
On 05/07/2001 02:03:33 PM Egon Willighagen wrote:
What about a Debian policy to remove packages for which alternatives are
available with same or similar functionality *and* for which development
has
stopped or almost stopped completely?
All you'll get is endless flamewars about same or
8 matches
Mail list logo