On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Barry deFreese wrote:
> OK, I have created a new page at:
> http://wiki.debian.org/Gtk1.2ImlibGnome1Removals and linked it to the
> OngoingTransitions page.
Would it be a good idea to file bugs against all packages depending on
the gnome1/gtk1/imlib1 stack? With
Daniel Leidert wrote:
It does *not* build-depend on gnome-bin and I already told you this (you
simply did not answer). Where do you see this build-dependency?
Regards, Daniel
Daniel,
Sorry about that, I keep going through so many of these, I keep mixing
up build-deps/deps in my syntax. Bu
On Friday 19 December 2008 21:07:09 Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 17.12.2008, 12:03 -0500 schrieb Barry deFreese:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Just in case anyone cares/is interested, here is some work I have been
> > doing on packages using Gtk1.2, Imlib, gnome-libs, or any combination
> > the
Daniel Leidert (19/12/2008):
> > bluefish
> > Actually built with gtk2 but still build-deps on gnome-bin?? (pinged
> > maintainer). Just a suggests, can probably be removed.
>
> It does *not* build-depend on gnome-bin and I already told you this
> (you simply did not answer). Where do you
Am Mittwoch, den 17.12.2008, 12:03 -0500 schrieb Barry deFreese:
> Hi folks,
>
> Just in case anyone cares/is interested, here is some work I have been
> doing on packages using Gtk1.2, Imlib, gnome-libs, or any combination
> thereof.
>
>
> Obviously some packages fall within more than one rde
Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Barry deFreese wrote:
Shoot, I didn't add that, Moritz did.
Ah, woops.
Which one should we actually use?
OngoingTransitions IMO (perhaps it could be renamed too).
BTW, found this page too:
http://wiki.debian.org/GTK%2B_
Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Barry deFreese wrote:
Shoot, I didn't add that, Moritz did.
Ah, woops.
Which one should we actually use?
OngoingTransitions IMO (perhaps it could be renamed too).
BTW, found this page too:
http://wiki.debian.org/GTK%2B_
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Shoot, I didn't add that, Moritz did.
Ah, woops.
> Which one should we actually use?
OngoingTransitions IMO (perhaps it could be renamed too).
BTW, found this page too:
http://wiki.debian.org/GTK%2B_1.2_leftovers
--
bye,
pabs
http:
Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:40 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Actually, it would be nice if we had a decicated cleanups/transitions
overview page on wiki.debian.org as a central starting point for
people who want to help out.
This is the old one:
http://wiki.debian.org
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:40 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Actually, it would be nice if we had a decicated cleanups/transitions
> overview page on wiki.debian.org as a central starting point for
> people who want to help out.
This is the old one:
http://wiki.debian.org/OngoingTransitions
Th
Barry deFreese wrote:
> Just in case anyone cares/is interested, here is some work I have been
> doing on packages using Gtk1.2, Imlib, gnome-libs, or any combination
> thereof.
Thanks.
Could you fold this into a page on wiki.debian.org, so that people
can add their specific solution attempts
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Just in case anyone cares/is interested, here is some work I have been doing
> on packages using Gtk1.2, Imlib, gnome-libs, or any combination thereof.
The playdv binary from libdv-bin can be dropped until it is ported to
GTK+ 2, bug filed
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Barry deFreese wrote:
sqlrelay
Some of the binaries have decent popcons. We could probably either port
sqlrelay-config-gtk or just remove that binary for now.
I'd also strongly vote for only droping this specific binary in case this
would be a Gtk 1.2 removal blocker b
Hi folks,
Just in case anyone cares/is interested, here is some work I have been
doing on packages using Gtk1.2, Imlib, gnome-libs, or any combination
thereof.
Obviously some packages fall within more than one rdepend/rbdepend.
gnome-libs:
bluefish
Actually built with gtk2 but still bui
14 matches
Mail list logo
