Hi!
On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 14:21:54 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 10:02:27 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:40:16PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
$ make -jN -f debian/rules build
and
$ DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=N debian/rules build
+++ Jonas Smedegaard [2015-05-13 15:44 +0200]:
Quoting Julian Taylor (2015-05-13 14:48:02)
Are those still parallel or does the flag override all submakes? The
option is not documented in make's manpage.
From make man page:
SEE ALSO
The full documentation for make is maintained as
[ reproducible-builds people, please see below. ]
Hi!
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 10:02:27 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:40:16PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
$ make -jN -f debian/rules build
and
$ DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=N debian/rules build
I prefer the
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote:
IMO dpkg-buildpackage should assume yes, in the same way it assumes
packages are cross-buildable, and we don't go around marking them as
such. But I guess for Debian that depends on how much of our packaging
and upstream
Quoting Julian Taylor (2015-05-13 14:48:02)
Are those still parallel or does the flag override all submakes? The
option is not documented in make's manpage.
From make man page:
SEE ALSO
The full documentation for make is maintained as a Texinfo manual. If
the info and make programs are
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:40:16PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
$ make -jN -f debian/rules build
and
$ DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=N debian/rules build
I prefer the latter behaviour but the former brevity. Would you consider
something like -J in dpkg-buildpackage adjusting parallel= in
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 19:56:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 18:49:25 +0100, Wookey wrote:
I'm happy if you change this - it seems like fixing a bug to me, but I
will just throw in this observation from recent arm64 archive-rebuilds,
that -j and
+++ Guillem Jover [2015-05-10 04:53 +0200]:
Hi!
“Recently” when adding support for «-jauto» to dpkg-buildpackage, I
noticed that the semantics for the -j option were quite unorthodox.
The value from the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS paralle= option takes precedence
and overrides any explicit value
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 18:49:25 +0100, Wookey wrote:
I'm happy if you change this - it seems like fixing a bug to me, but I
will just throw in this observation from recent arm64 archive-rebuilds, that
-j and DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel= are not exactly the same. Is that
expected? If not then
Hi!
“Recently” when adding support for «-jauto» to dpkg-buildpackage, I
noticed that the semantics for the -j option were quite unorthodox.
The value from the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS paralle= option takes precedence
and overrides any explicit value passed on the commend-line via -j,
(when -j should be
10 matches
Mail list logo
