On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:40:27AM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
I would be glad to change it if there were a fair number of
developers who think that suggesting contrib software is fine.
Suggesting contrib software is fine.
--
- mdz
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 10:05:17AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:40:27AM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
Some users have approached me about my packaging on tvtime, which lives
in main. It benefits greatly from libdscaler, a contrib package. They
are asking that tvtime
Hi guys,
Some users have approached me about my packaging on tvtime, which lives
in main. It benefits greatly from libdscaler, a contrib package. They
are asking that tvtime Suggests libdscaler. I thought that the
appropriate thing to do was to have libdscaler Extends tvtime.
My
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:40:27AM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
Some users have approached me about my packaging on tvtime, which lives
in main. It benefits greatly from libdscaler, a contrib package. They
are asking that tvtime Suggests libdscaler. I thought that the
appropriate thing to do
Hi,
Steve Langasek wrote:
With the exception of the recent aptitude bug, this makes all the
difference between pulling in non-free packages by default, and
informing the user by default that a non-free package is available which
complements the chosen package.
umm. there are packages in
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 05:52:36PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
With the exception of the recent aptitude bug, this makes all the
difference between pulling in non-free packages by default, and
informing the user by default that a non-free package is available which
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:40:27AM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
Hi guys,
Some users have approached me about my packaging on tvtime, which lives
in main. It benefits greatly from libdscaler, a contrib package. They
are asking that tvtime Suggests libdscaler. I thought that the
appropriate
7 matches
Mail list logo
