William Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 11:33:21AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
Right. Do you regard this as a problem?
It would be a lot smarter to check if the install would succeed
before unpacking it. If you were replacing a previous alsa-modules
package, the
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 04:20:04 +0100, William Ballard wrote:
Kernel module source packages generated Debian packages which may not be
installable. For instance, alsa-source does not depend on alsa-base,
but the generated alsa-modules does. ndiswrapper-source does the same
with
El lun, 03-01-2005 a las 11:33 +0100, Thomas Hood escribi:
[...]
What ends up happening now is the package ends up installing broken.
I am not sure what you mean by this. Here is what happens when I install
an alsa-modules package in the absence of alsa-base:
[EMAIL
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 11:33:21AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
Right. Do you regard this as a problem?
It would be a lot smarter to check if the install would succeed
before unpacking it. If you were replacing a previous alsa-modules
package, the old one will be uninstalled and non-functional
Kernel module source packages generated Debian packages which may not be
installable. For instance, alsa-source does not depend on alsa-base,
but the generated alsa-modules does. ndiswrapper-source does the same
with ndiswrapper-utils.
Is there a flag to dpkg to refuse to install unless
5 matches
Mail list logo
