On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 06:03:41PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015, Ole Streicher wrote:
I'd support this -- we could also discuss the distributed filesystem
approach there. Could this happen between Friday (DebCamp) and Tuesday?
I have to leave on Wednesday...
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015, Ole Streicher wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:58:32PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
+1
Would you register a large data set BoF in Summit?
something like
https://summit.debconf.org/debconf15/meeting/333/bof-big-data-packages/
Yes.
? not sure if I would
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
Hi
Wouldn't a p2p system scale better than any server based solution? Also in
regards to cost...
gittorrent[1] would be great for this.
[1]
http://blog.printf.net/articles/2015/05/29/announcing-gittorrent-a-decentralized-github/
Troy Benjegerdes ho...@hozed.org writes:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:38:06PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Ole Streicher oleb...@debian.org, 2015-07-17, 10:34:
But: These packages sum up to ~25 GB, with the maximal package
size of 3.5 GB.
Well, that's a lot. Just as data points:
* The
Hi
Wouldn't a p2p system scale better than any server based solution? Also in
regards to cost...
Pedro.
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Philip Hands p...@hands.com wrote:
Troy Benjegerdes ho...@hozed.org writes:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:38:06PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Ole
Pedro Larroy pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com writes:
Wouldn't a p2p system scale better than any server based solution?
Also in regards to cost...
I am a bit afraid about the long-term availability of any non-standard,
new solution: Anything we implement now (and used for Debian 9) should
be
Hi Ole,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:36:56AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
? not sure if I would actually like to be The Speaker ;)
Why not. Your mail contained someconstructove details that could
kickstart a discussion. There is not more needed in a BoF.
I'd support this -- we could
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:58:32PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
+1
Would you register a large data set BoF in Summit?
something like
https://summit.debconf.org/debconf15/meeting/333/bof-big-data-packages/
Yes.
? not sure if I would actually
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes:
I doubt that we can or should reproduce the catalogs from the
original exposures in Debian -- this would require disk space,
computing power and man power which we obviously don't have.
May be ftpmaster might give some input here - if we are lucky one
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:41:44AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
Pedro Larroy pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com writes:
Wouldn't a p2p system scale better than any server based solution?
Also in regards to cost...
I am a bit afraid about the long-term availability of any non-standard,
new
Hi all,
again a question where I find it difficult to put it into one single
box. However, please reply to debian-science.
I am trying to get the package astrometry.net into Debian. This
package exists for Ubuntu [1], but (with some minor changes) could be
uploaded to Debian as well. I already
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Ole Streicher wrote:
Hi all,
again a question where I find it difficult to put it into one single
box. However, please reply to debian-science.
I am trying to get the package astrometry.net into Debian. This
package exists for Ubuntu [1], but (with some minor changes)
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:03:36PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Going to debconf15? may be we could have a BoF or just a lunch chat to
discuss this eye-to-eye? ;)
+1
Would you register a large data set BoF in Summit?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To
* Ole Streicher oleb...@debian.org, 2015-07-17, 10:34:
But: These packages sum up to ~25 GB, with the maximal package size of
3.5 GB.
Well, that's a lot. Just as data points:
* The biggest binary package currently in the archive,
ns3-doc_3.17+dfsg-1_all.deb, is only ~1GB.
* The biggest
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Andreas Tille wrote:
Going to debconf15? may be we could have a BoF or just a lunch chat to
discuss this eye-to-eye? ;)
+1
Would you register a large data set BoF in Summit?
something like
https://summit.debconf.org/debconf15/meeting/333/bof-big-data-packages/
? not
Hi!
On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 12:03:36 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Ole Streicher wrote:
But: These packages sum up to ~25 GB, with the maximal package size of
3.5 GB. What is the best way to deal with them? Loosely following the
discussion about the Icedove icons, it
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:38:06PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Ole Streicher oleb...@debian.org, 2015-07-17, 10:34:
But: These packages sum up to ~25 GB, with the maximal package
size of 3.5 GB.
Well, that's a lot. Just as data points:
* The biggest binary package currently in the archive,
Hi Yarislav,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:58:32PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
+1
Would you register a large data set BoF in Summit?
something like
https://summit.debconf.org/debconf15/meeting/333/bof-big-data-packages/
Yes.
? not sure if I would actually like to be The Speaker ;)
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015, Guillem Jover wrote:
The ultimate solution we are aiming for (see http://datalad.org for more
information) is to utilize git-annex and ship either mere pointers to
git-annex sources or lean (without data) git-annex repositories which
fetch data from original (or
19 matches
Mail list logo
