On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 03:37:56PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 12:53:47PM +0200, ignatius wrote:
> > I'm happy that you don't see me as a troll.
>
> I see your remarks as off-topic on this list, though. Please look for a
> more appropriate list, debian-devel is
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 12:53:47PM +0200, ignatius wrote:
> I'm happy that you don't see me as a troll.
I see your remarks as off-topic on this list, though. Please look for a
more appropriate list, debian-devel is for development.
thanks,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
[It's a general answer]
I'm happy that you don't see me as a troll.
I've already heard all these arguments that are _not_ arguments. For me
the perfect distribution doesn't exist and never will (because of
upstream). I have a simple dream : that Debian stable ships for instance
linux 2.16 whi
Hallo,
On 6/22/07, Sam Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is nothing wrong with debian and if your are talking about windows
then you are not even used to the "linux way"
Wow, I've not seen a moronic argument like this in a while.
--
-alex
http://www.ventonegro.org/
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Fri Jun 22, 2007 at 20:24:22 +0200, ignatius wrote:
> - Why it's Debian that fixes bugs and security holes? Why it isn't upstream
> developers?
Generally upstream developers *will* fix security holes, however
Debian users generally get their software from *us*.
So if we're shipping so
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 08:24:22PM +0200, ignatius wrote:
> I have two questions that really concerned me.
>
> - Why it's Debian that fixes bugs and security holes? Why it isn't
> upstream developers? How can you be sure that all security holes will be
> found or revealed? (for instance an old s
ignatius wrote:
I have two questions that really concerned me.
- Why it's Debian that fixes bugs and security holes? Why it isn't
upstream developers? How can you be sure that all security holes will
be found or revealed? (for instance an old software in stable can have
a security issue whi
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 08:24:22PM +0200, ignatius wrote:
> I have two questions that really concerned me.
>
> - Why it's Debian that fixes bugs and security holes?
There are lots of differences between:
upstream and Debian release goals
upstream and Debian build environment (debian has 10+ arch
I have two questions that really concerned me.
- Why it's Debian that fixes bugs and security holes? Why it isn't
upstream developers? How can you be sure that all security holes will be
found or revealed? (for instance an old software in stable can have a
security issue which is not in the re
9 matches
Mail list logo
