Re: I2O specs mailed to webmaster

1998-10-12 Thread Gregory S. Stark
Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: it was mailed from a dummy hotmail account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), and the originating IP was from an ISP in Norway. On the off chance that the original sender is reading this, or looking at the e-mail archive: Hotmail is not an anonymous mailing system,

Re: I2O specs mailed to webmaster

1998-10-12 Thread Thomas Lakofski
On 12 Oct 1998, Gregory S. Stark wrote: On the off chance that the original sender is reading this, or looking at the e-mail archive: Hotmail is not an anonymous mailing system, and makes no pretense of such. They will happily hand over records if needed. Equally the information you supply to

I2O specs mailed to webmaster

1998-10-08 Thread treacy
Version 2.0a of the I2O spec (dated 3 Feb 1998) has been sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this the same version that was made available before? Jay Treacy

Re: I2O specs mailed to webmaster

1998-10-08 Thread David Welton
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 05:18:01PM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote: Version 2.0a of the I2O spec (dated 3 Feb 1998) has been sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this the same version that was made available before? Did it come from anyplace interesting, out of curiousity? Ciao, -- David Welton

Re: I2O specs mailed to webmaster

1998-10-08 Thread Craig Sanders
On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, David Welton wrote: On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 05:18:01PM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote: Version 2.0a of the I2O spec (dated 3 Feb 1998) has been sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this the same version that was made available before? no, that was version 1.5. Did it come from

Re: I2O specs mailed to webmaster

1998-10-08 Thread Ben Pfaff
[EMAIL PROTECTED](James A. Treacy) writes: Version 2.0a of the I2O spec (dated 3 Feb 1998) has been sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this the same version that was made available before? No, that was version 1.5, at least according to the filename. The date of download I have is 3 March