On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 10:44:37AM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > Sounds good. Can you bug upstream to include support for other
> > authentication methods eg SecureID? I'm stuck with a Windows IPsec
> > client until SecureID is supported. KAME (on BSD) doesn't appear
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Sounds good. Can you bug upstream to include support for other
> authentication methods eg SecureID? I'm stuck with a Windows IPsec
> client until SecureID is supported. KAME (on BSD) doesn't appear to
> do it either.
SecureID is really in another "layer" of authentication.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 11:17:36AM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> I intent to package freeswan (currently version 1.5) and have already taken
> the
> freeswan 1.3 package from Tommi Virtanen and the freeswan 1.5 package from
> Aaron
> Johnson. I will merge those with my own package and hope to ge
I intent to package freeswan (currently version 1.5) and have already taken the
freeswan 1.3 package from Tommi Virtanen and the freeswan 1.5 package from Aaron
Johnson. I will merge those with my own package and hope to get something that
can be uploaded into woody in the next 2 weeks.
Since I liv
Lauri Tischler was said to been seen saying:
> Great, does anybody know what kind of compatibility exists between
> freeswan and f-secure-vpn and sonicwall-vpn and checkpoint-vpn
> They all say that they are rfc-compliant
>
FreeS/WAN is supposed to be able interop with checkpoint and
NAI'
Tommi Virtanen wrote:
>
> I intend to package FreeS/WAN, the Linux IPSec
> framework, available at www.freeswan.org.
> I can hopefully provide kernel-patch packages
> for 2.0, 2.2 and 2.3 (2.4) kernels.
Great, does anybody know what kind of compatibility exists bet
I intend to package FreeS/WAN, the Linux IPSec
framework, available at www.freeswan.org.
I can hopefully provide kernel-patch packages
for 2.0, 2.2 and 2.3 (2.4) kernels.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],havoc,gaeshido}.fi,{debian,wanderer}.org,stonesoft.com}
unix, linux, debia
7 matches
Mail list logo
