Re: Idea for package name instead of "build" (ITP)

> "Michael" == Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Since it seems to generate makefiles, I suggest Automake :-) >> >> But, slightly more seriously "mentioning" Gnu Make might also >> be a possibility: e.g. gmbuild or mkbuild or makebuild or >> mfbuild.

Re: Idea for package name instead of "build" (ITP)

On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 07:30:37PM +0100, David Bremner wrote: > > "Raphael" == Raphael Bossek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Raphael> Now I'm looking for a idea how to name the "build" > Raphael> package. For my perspective of view is "build" to simple > Raphael> to be package

Re: Idea for package name instead of "build" (ITP)

> "Raphael" == Raphael Bossek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Raphael> Now I'm looking for a idea how to name the "build" Raphael> package. For my perspective of view is "build" to simple Raphael> to be packaged as it is. My idea was to sue the first Raphael> letters (forename, su

Idea for package name instead of "build" (ITP)

Hi folks, I intent to package (ITP) the http://codesynthesis.com/products/xsd/ tool set (XSD: XML Data Binding for C++). To get the packaging working a special build environment has to be installed, called "build" (http://kolpackov.net/projects/build/). To do so, I've to package the "build" packag