On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:10:53AM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> * Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> > Actually it's weird. Pine seems to be surviving for some reason. I
> > don't know why. :-/
>
> It is what my users learned on some other AIX maschine at my
> university. It is the first mailer I le
* Michael Piefel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 5.01.01 um 10:10:53 schrieb Martin Bialasinski:
>> * Anthony Towns wrote:
>> > Actually it's weird. Pine seems to be surviving for some reason. I
>> > don't know why. :-/
>> [...]
>> Pine is extremely easy to use and understand. I don't know any o
Am 5.01.01 um 10:10:53 schrieb Martin Bialasinski:
> * Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Actually it's weird. Pine seems to be surviving for some reason. I
> > don't know why. :-/
> [...]
> Pine is extremely easy to use and understand. I don't know any other
> mailer like it. Last time I tried pine mode i
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:21:29PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:17:05PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > Basically: don't do them.
> > Cool! I will tag all pine bugs as "wontfix"...
> Actually it's weird. Pine seems to be surviving for some reas
* Anthony Towns wrote:
> Actually it's weird. Pine seems to be surviving for some reason. I
> don't know why. :-/
It is what my users learned on some other AIX maschine at my
university. It is the first mailer I learned and used.
Pine is extremely easy to use and understand. I don't know any ot
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:17:05PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Basically: don't do them.
> Cool! I will tag all pine bugs as "wontfix"...
Actually it's weird. Pine seems to be surviving for some reason. I don't
know why. :-/
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECT
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Basically: don't do them.
Cool! I will tag all pine bugs as "wontfix"...
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 01:24:08PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> The most important problem this has is how katie (the new dinstall)
> processes it. It goes through the following motions:
I guess it needs to be fixed, right? I'd actually like to see
source-only become the norm--we've seen too many
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Basically: don't do them.
Gack. I know several people have counted on this working in the past.
Moreover, it's really a *good* thing, if you don't have a lot of control
over your build environment. Let the autobuilders do it.
> The most important problem this has is how kat
Hello world,
Basically: don't do them.
In more detail: it's possible, even easy with the recent versions of dpkg,
to do source-only uploads to the archive. That is only upload a diff and a
dsc (and maybe an orig.tgz), without any .debs at all.
The most important problem this has is how katie (th
10 matches
Mail list logo
